Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 501–506 | Cite as

Emotional support levels can predict physical functioning and health related quality of life among elderly Taiwanese with hip fractures

  • Y.-I. L. Shyu
  • W.-R. Tang
  • W.-C. Tsai
  • J. Liang
  • M.-C. Chen
Original Article



There has been increasing interest in the role emotional support plays on recovery and the perceptions of health. However, the vast majority of studies have been based on data from Western nations. Little is known about hip-fractured elders in Asian countries. This study has examined the influences of emotional support on functional recovery, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among elderly patients in Taiwan.


Data were gathered from 126 hip fractured elders, in a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan. Eleven items from the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Social Support Survey were administered, in order to measure emotional support at 1 month after discharge. The Chinese Barthel Index (CBI), Lawton and Brody’s instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale, and MOS Short Form—36 Taiwan version were administered at the end of months 1, 3, and 6 after discharge.


After controllong for covariates, greater levels of emotional support predicted a better recovery of the activities of daily living (ADL) (β=0.23, P=0.04) and IADL (β=0.03, P=0.03), and better HRQoL in seven of eight dimensions (P ranged from <0.0001 to 0.04), except social function, emotional role , and physical role during the first 6 months after hospital discharge.


Emotional support can have a significant impact on the recovery of self— care ability, and different aspects of HRQoL during the first 6 months after discharge for hip fractured elders in Taiwan. Clinical implications were made, on the basis of these findings.


Activities of daily living Depressive symptoms Health related quality of life Hip fractured elders Social support 



This work was funded by the National Health Research Institute, Taiwan, Republic of China.


  1. 1.
    Randell AG, Nguyen TV, Bhalerao N, Silverman SL, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2000) Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:460–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shyu YIL, Lu JFR, Liang J (2004) Evaluation of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form–36 Taiwan version in assessing in elderly patients with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:575–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shyu YIL, Chen MC, Liang J, Wu CC, Su JY (2004) Predictors of functional recovery for hip fractured elders at twelve months following hospital discharge: a prospective study on a Taiwanese sample. Osteoporos Int 15:475–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manpower Planning Department, Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (1996) Projections of the population of Taiwan area, Republic of China 1995 to 2036. Manpower Planning Department, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Wallden B (1980) Prognostic indicators and early home rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:173–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE (1990) Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol 45:M101–M107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cobey JC, Cobey JH, Conant L, Weil UH, Greenwald WF, Southwick WO (1976) Indicators of recovery from fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:258–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cummings SR, Phillips SL, Wheat ME et al (1988) Recovery of function after hip fracture. The role of social supports. J Am Geriatr Soc 36:801–806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cree M, Hayduk L, Soskolne CL, Suarez–Almazor M (2001) Modeling changes in health perception following hip fracture. Qual Life Res 10:651–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farahmand BY, Persson PG, Michaelsson K et al (2000) Socioeconomic status, marital status and hip fracture risk: A population–based case–control study. Osteoporos Int 11:803–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mutran EJ, Reitzes DC, Mossey J, Fernandez ME (1995) Social support, depression, and recovery of walking ability following hip fracture surgery. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:S354–S361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nickens HW (1983) A review of factors affecting the occurrence and outcome of hip fracture, with special reference to psychosocial issues. J Am Geriatr Soc 31:166–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilcox VL, Kasl SV, Berkman LF (1994) Social support and physical disability in older people after hospitalization: a prospective study. Health Psychol 1:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shyu YIL, Liang J, Lu JFR, Wu CC (2004) Environmental barriers and mobility in Taiwan: Is Roy Adaptation Model applicable? Nurs Sci Q 17:165–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Angerer P, Siebert U, Kothny W, Muhlbauer D, Mudra H, von Schacky C (2000) Impact of social support, cynical hostility and anger expression on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1781–1788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganz PA, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Lash TL, Rakowski W, Silliman RA (2003) Breast cancer in older woman: quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in the 15 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 21:4027–4033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedland J, Renwick R, McColl M (1996) Coping and social support as determinants of quality of life in HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care 8:15–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    King KB (1997) Psychologic and social aspects of cardiovascular disease. Ann Behav Med 19:264–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritchie MA (2001) Sources of emotional support for adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 18:105–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL (1991) The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 32:705–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen YJ, Dai YT, Yang CT, Wang TJ, Teng YH (1995) A review and proposal on patient classification in long-term care system. Department of Health, Republic of China, Taipei, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lawton MP, Brody E (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chou KL, Chi I (2003) Reciprocal relationship between social support and depressive symptoms among Chinese elderly. Aging Ment Health 7:224–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li SC, Wang KY, Lin JC (2003) Depression and related factors in elderly patients with occlusion stroke. J Nurs Res 11:9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burke WJ, Roccaforte WH, Wengel SP (1991) The short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a comparison with the 30–item form. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 4:173–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu CY, Lu CH, Yu S et al (1998) Correlations between scores on Chinese versions of long and short forms of the Geriatric Depression Scale among elderly Chinese. Psychol Rep 82:211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liang KY, Zeger SL (1993) Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 14:43–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams DR, Wilson CM (2001) Race, ethnicity, and aging. In: Binstock RJ, George LK (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 160–178Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson RA, Tripp–Reimer T (2001) Aging, ethnicity, social support. A review–part 1. J Gerontol Nurs 27:15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Directorate–General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan & Ministry of Interior, R.O.C. (1997) Report on the old status survey: Taiwan area, Republic of China (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hermalin AI (ed) (2002) The well-being of the elderly in Asia: a four-country comparative study. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hogan DP, Eggebeen DJ, Clogg CC (1993) The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families. Am J Sociol 98:1428–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dai YT, Dimond MF (1998) A cross-cultural comparison and its implications for the well-being of older parents. J Gerontol Nurs 24:13–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    United Nations (2002) World population ageing, 1950–2050. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hsu HC, Chang MC (1994) Successful aging and active aging in Taiwan: a mult-level analysis. Taiwanese J Soc Welf 3:1–36 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y.-I. L. Shyu
    • 1
  • W.-R. Tang
    • 2
  • W.-C. Tsai
    • 3
  • J. Liang
    • 4
  • M.-C. Chen
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Gerontological Research, School of NursingChang Gung UniversityTaiwanRepublic of China
  2. 2.School of NursingChang Gung UniversityTaiwanRepublic of China
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryNational Taiwan University HospitalTaiwanRepublic of China
  4. 4.School of Public Health & Institute of GerontologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Department of Public Health & Biostatistics Consulting CenterChang Gung UniversityTaiwanRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations