Osteoporosis International

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 1086–1095

Vertebral deformity, back symptoms, and functional limitations among older women: The Framingham Study

  • Susan L. Edmond
  • Douglas P. Kiel
  • Elizabeth J. Samelson
  • Margaret Kelly-Hayes
  • David T. Felson
Original Article

Abstract

Vertebral deformity is the most common manifestation of osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between incident vertebral deformity and back symptoms; and limitations in nine specific functional activities. Subjects were participants in the Framingham Study, a longitudinal, population-based sample involving residents of Framingham, MA, USA. Subjects consisted of 444 surviving female members of the original cohort who had baseline (1968–1975) and follow-up (1992–1993) spine radiographs evaluated for deformity using a semiquantitative scale. Ages ranged from 72 to 96 years. At the follow-up examination, subjects were asked if they experienced pain, aching, or stiffness in their back on most days and if they had difficulty performing nine specific functional skills. We found that incident vertebral deformity was associated with limitations in several functional activities, most notably, pushing or pulling a large object (OR 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.40, 4.52). For most activities, there was no increase in the risk of functional limitations among women with vertebral deformity who did not report back symptoms at the end of the follow-up compared with those without vertebral deformity or back symptoms. For several functional activities, individuals with both vertebral deformity and back symptoms had greater limitations than would be expected from the additive contribution of both conditions. Back symptoms were associated with limitations in most functional activities, even in the absence of vertebral deformity. Efforts to prevent and treat back pain, independent of vertebral deformity status, might help to reduce functional limitations in older women.

Keywords

Back pain Function Older adults Vertebral deformity 

References

  1. 1.
    Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:30S–42SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA et al (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies KM, Stegman MR, Heaney RP, et al (1996) Prevalence and severity of vertebral fracture: the Saunders County Bone Quality Study. Osteoporos Int 6:160–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper C (1997) The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103:12S–19SGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lavsky-Shulan M, Wallace RB, Kohout FJ et al (1985) Prevalence and functional correlates of low back pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 33:23–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leveille SG, Penninx BW, Melzer D et al (2000) Sex differences in the prevalence of mobility disability in old age: the dynamics of incidence, recovery, and mortality. J Gerontol 55:S41–S50Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edmond SL, Felson DT (2003) Function and back symptoms among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, et al (1993) Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med 94:595–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gold DT (1996) The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone 18 (Suppl 3):185–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlaich C. Minne HW, Bruckner T, et al (1998) Reduced pulmonary function in patients with spinal osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 8:261–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, et al (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper C (1993) Epidemiology and public health impact of osteoporosis. Bailliere’s Clin Rheumatol 7:459–477Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al (1992) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. J Bone Miner Res 7:449–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, et al (1994) Pain and disability associated with new vertebral fractures and other spinal conditions. J Clin Epidemiol 47:231–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greendale GA, Barrett-Connor E, Ingles S, et al (1995) Late physical and functional effects of osteoporotic fracture in women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:955–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fractures and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 156:2469–2473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burger H, Van Daele PLA, Grashuis K, et al (1997) Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 12:152–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leidig-Bruckner G. Minne HW, Schlaich C, et al (1997) Clinical grading of spinal osteoporosis: quality of life components and spinal deformity in women with chronic low back pain and women with vertebral osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 12:663–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan SD, Fried LP (1997) The impact of kyphosis on daily functioning. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1479–1486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthis C, Weber U, O’Neill TW, et al (1998) Health impact associated with vertebral deformities: results from the European Vertebral Ostoporosis Study (EVOS). Osteoporos Int 8:364–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann of Intern Med 128:793–800Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporos Int 10:150–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jinbayashi H, Aoyagi K, Ross PD et al (2002) Prevalence of vertebral deformity and its associations with physical impairment among Japanese women: the Hizen-Oshima Study. Osteoporos Int 13:723–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the congnitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12:189–198Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Neill TE, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone and Miner Res 11:1010–1018Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bengner U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I (1988) Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years. Calcif Tissue Int 42:293–296Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, et al (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. J Bone and Miner Res 11:984–996Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, et al (1999) Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. J Bone Miner Res 14:90–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Edmond SL, Felson DT (2000) Back symptoms in the elderly. J Rheumatol 27:220–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nagi SZ (1976) An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly—Health and Society 54:439–467Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Allaire SH, LaValley MP, Evans SR, et al (1999) Evidence for decline in disability and improved health among persons aged 55 to 70 years: the Framingham Heart Study. AJPH 89:1678–1683Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ et al (1994) The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 84:351–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M et al (2002) Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly: the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol 156:1021–1027PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rothman KJ (1986) Modern epidemiology, 1st edn. Little, Brown BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lunt M, Masaryk P, Scheidt-Nave C et al (2001) The effects of lifestyle, dietary dairy intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity prevalence: the EVOS study. Osteoporos Int 12:688–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L et al (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan L. Edmond
    • 1
  • Douglas P. Kiel
    • 2
    • 3
  • Elizabeth J. Samelson
    • 2
    • 3
  • Margaret Kelly-Hayes
    • 4
  • David T. Felson
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Medicine and Dentistry New JerseyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Research and Training InstituteBostonUSA
  4. 4.Boston University School of MedicineBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations