Osteoporosis International

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 120–124 | Cite as

Undertreatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs after hospitalization for fracture

  • Martien J. M. Panneman
  • Paul Lips
  • Shuvayu S. Sen
  • Ron M. C. Herings
Original Article


This study assessed the proportion of patients treated with anti-osteoporotic drugs during the 1-year period after hospitalization for a fracture, and the influence of a guideline in the period 1998–2000 on the likelihood of receiving treatment for osteoporosis after a fracture. Patients were assessed retrospectively for anti-osteoporotic drug use during a 1-year period following hospitalization for non-traumatic fracture. The PHARMO system, a population-based database (n=865,000) containing drug and hospitalization data of community-dwelling inhabitants of defined areas in the Netherlands, was used. The study population comprised 1654 patients age 50 years and over who were admitted to hospital for a fracture resulting from a fall during the period 1998–2000. The treatment rate of newly treated patients and the change in treatment rate throughout the period 1998–2000 were the outcome measures. The majority of these patients were women (73%), and had femur fractures (51%). In total, 247 out of 1654 patients (15%) were prescribed anti-osteoporotic drugs within 1 year after discharge from the hospital. Of these 247 patients, 86 were newly treated, mainly with bisphosphonates in the year after discharge following the fracture, yielding a new treatment rate of 5%. The likelihood of receiving treatment for osteoporosis following fracture did not change with the calendar year of fracture (OR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.68–1.30). The result of this study shows that despite the introduction of an osteoporosis treatment guideline in 1999 recommending treatment for fracture patients, most of the time, fracture patients are not being treated for osteoporosis. Thus, to a large extent, osteoporosis remains under-treated.


Anti-osteoporotic drugs Fracture Osteoporosis Undertreatment 


  1. 1.
    Geusens P, Autier P, Boonen S, Vanhoof J, Declerck K, Raus J (2002) The relationship among history of falls, osteoporosis, and fractures in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:903–906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melton LJ 3rd (2001) The prevalence of osteoporosis: gender and racial comparison. Calcif Tissue Int 69:179–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N, Poliquin S, Murray TM, Blondeau L et al. (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doube A (1999) Managing osteoporosis in older people with fractures. BMJ 318:477–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnell O, Oden A, Caulin F, Kanis JA (2001) Acute and long-term increase in fracture risk after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 12:207–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klotzbucher C, Ross P, Landman P, Abott TI, Berger M (2000) Patient with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB et al. (2001) Risk of new vertabral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sherf M, Liel Y (2001) Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int 12:559–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McLellan AR (2003) Identification and treatment of osteoporosis in fractures. Curr Rheumatol Rep 5:57–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pal B (1999) Questionnaire survey of advice given to patients with fractures. BMJ 318:500–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    al-Allaf AW, Pal B, Reid N (1998) An audit of post fracture rehabilitation with special emphasis on osteoporosis assessment and treatment. Clin Exp Rheumatol 16:451–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamel HK, Hussain MS, Tariq S, Perry HM, Morley JE (2000) Failure to diagnose and treat osteoporosis in elderly patients hospitalized with hip fracture. Am J Med 109:326–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torgerson DJ, Dolan P (1998) Prescribing by general practitioners after an osteoporotic fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 57:378–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Melton LJ 3rd (2002) Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures. Arch Int Med 162:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, Strom BL, Lowe RA (2000) Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82-A:1063–1070Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gezondheidsraad: Commissie Osteoporose (1998) Preventie van aan osteoporose gerelateerde fracturen. Gezondheidsraad, RijswijkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CBO (2002) Osteoporose Tweede Herziene Richtlijn. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elders PJ, van Keimpema JC, Petri H, Matser A (1999) NHG-standaard Osteoporose. Huisarts Wet 42:115–128Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herings RMC (1993) PHARMO: a record linkage system for postmarketing surveillance of prescription drugs in the Netherlands. Doctorate, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martien J. M. Panneman
    • 1
  • Paul Lips
    • 2
  • Shuvayu S. Sen
    • 3
  • Ron M. C. Herings
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.PHARMO InstituteUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyAcademic Hospital Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Whitehouse StationMerck & Co. Inc.USA
  4. 4.Department of Pharmaco-epidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations