Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study
The aim of this prospective study was to document the functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) over 1 year following hip fracture in elderly women. A total of 159 unselected elderly women with a first hip fracture were matched for age and residence with an equal number of control women. Functional status was measured by completing a Rapid Disability Rating Scale version 2 (RDRS-2) questionnaire [score ranging from 0 (best) to 54 (worse)], before hospital discharge and 12 months later. To examine longitudinal change in health-related QoL, fracture subjects and controls completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. For the 134 women still alive at 1 year, the mean RDRS-2 score before hospital discharge was 16.2 (95% CI: 15.0–18.0) and 3.5 (2.6–4.3) in patients and controls, respectively (P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean RDRS-2 score improved to 13.0 (11.1–14.1) in hip-fracture women and worsened to 4.3 (3.3–5.0) in the control group (differences with initial scores: P<0.001 in both groups). After adjustment for potential confounders (including age and comorbidity), the estimated functional decline attributable to a hip fracture was 24% in the first year. Poor functional status upon discharge was the strongest predictor of a poor functional status at 1 year. Overall, similar trends were observed when using SF-36 scores as compared with RDRS-2 scores. However, only 51% of the study population was able to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at discharge and after 1 year, and these subjects were considerably younger (P<0.001), had less cognitive impairment (P<0.001), and had better functional status (P<0.001) than those who were unable to complete the SF-36. For those women able to complete the SF-36 questionnaires, the mean SF-36 score before hospital discharge was 56.4 (95% CI: 51.9–60.9) and 71.1 (67.5–74.8) in patients and controls, respectively (P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean SF-36 score improved significantly to 61.1 (56.5–65.7) in hip-fracture patients (P=0.03), but remained unchanged in the control group (P=0.23). Overall, the results of this study indicate that women who sustain a hip fracture continue to suffer from substantial functional impairment and loss in QoL at 1 year, despite a significant recovery during this 12-month period. Function upon hospital discharge is the strongest predictor of functional status 1 year later. Assessing QoL in hip fracture women through self-administered questionnaires is subject to considerable bias due to non-response.
KeywordsElderly women Functional outcome Hip fracture Quality of life
We are indebted to the participating women and their families. This work was partly supported by a medical research grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme BV, Belgium. This study was supported by grant G.0171.03 from the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium (F.W.O.-Vlaanderen) to S. Boonen. Dr. S. Boonen and Dr. D. Vanderschueren are senior clinical investigators of the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium (FWO Vlaanderen). Dr. S. Boonen is holder of the Leuven University Chair in Metabolic Bone Diseases, founded and supported by Merck, Sharp & Dohme.
- 1.Cooper C (1997) The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103(2A):12S–19SGoogle Scholar
- 3.Haentjens P, Autier P, Barette M, Boonen S (2001) The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women. A one-year, prospective, observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83-A:496–500Google Scholar
- 8.Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE (1990) Predictors of functional recovery 1 year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol Med Sci 45:M101–107Google Scholar
- 10.Fox KM, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE, Kashner TM (1999) Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae. J Gerontol Med Sci 54A:M635–M640Google Scholar
- 14.Svensson O, Strömberg L, Öhlen G, Lindgren U (1996) Prediction of the outcome after hip fracture in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 78-B:115–118Google Scholar
- 16.Wolinsky FD, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE (1997) The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health 87:398–403Google Scholar
- 23.Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, and the Kinemax Outcomes Group (2001) Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83-A:1149–1156Google Scholar