Osteoporosis International

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Adherence with hip protectors: a proposal for standardised definitions

  • S. E. Kurrle
  • I. D. Cameron
  • S. Quine
  • R. G. Cumming
Opinion

Abstract

Definitions of adherence, also termed compliance, with use of hip protectors have varied in published studies, making interpretation of results difficult. This paper proposes standard definitions of adherence with the use of hip protectors. Adherence is the wearing of hip protectors in accordance with the recommendations of the study protocol, and is measured as the amount of time hip protectors are worn. When reporting use of hip protectors in clinical trials investigators should indicate the specific definition of adherence used, explicitly state the recommendation that was made for use of hip protectors during the study, and describe the methods of recording adherence.

Keywords

Adherence Compliance Elderly Hip fracture Hip protectors 

References

  1. 1.
    Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J et al. (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parker MJ, Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ (2003) Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Update Software, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lauritzen JB, Petersen MM, Lund B (1993) Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures. Lancet 341:11–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heikinheimo RJ, Jantti PL, Aho HJ, Maki-Jokela PL (1996) To fall but not to break—safety pants. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Injury Prevention and Control, Melbourne, Australia, 18–22 February, pp 74–75Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekman A, Mallin H, Michaelson K et al. (1997) External hip protectors prevent osteoporotic hip fractures. Lancet 350:563–564Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parkkari J, Heikkila J, Kannus P (1998) Acceptability and compliance with wearing energy-shunting hip protectors: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home. Age Ageing 27:225–230Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Villar MTA, Hill P, Inskip H et al. (1998) Will elderly rest home residents wear hip protectors? Age Ageing 27:195–198Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S et al. (2000) Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector. N Engl J Med 343:1506–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becker C, Walter-Jung B, Nikolaus T (2000) The other side of hip protectors. Age Ageing 29:186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson PW, Jones C (2000) Adherence to hip protector use in elderly people requiring domiciliary care is greater in fallers than non-fallers. Age Ageing 29:459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan DK, Hillier G, Coore M et al. (2000) Effectiveness and acceptability of a newly designed hip protector: a pilot study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 30:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cameron ID, Venman J, Kurrle SE et al. (2001) Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomised trial of use by individual higher-risk residents. Age Ageing 30:477–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hubacher M, Wettstein A (2001) Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes. Osteoporos Int 12:794–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harada A, Mizuno M, Takemura M et al. (2001) Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes. Osteoporos Int 12:215–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cryer C, Knox A, Martin D, Barlow J (2002) Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes. Injury Prevention 8:202–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyer G, Warnke A, Bender R, Muhlhauser I (2003) Effect on hip fractures of increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 326:76–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Schoor NM, Deville WL, Bouter LM, Lips P (2002) Acceptance and compliance with external hip protectors: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 13:917–924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cameron ID, Stafford B, Cumming RG et al. (2000) Hip protectors improve falls self-efficacy. Age Ageing 29:57–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lockwood K, Cameron ID, Gladman J, Kurrle SE, Lanzarone S (2003) Hip protectors: an implementation trial in two geriatric rehabilitation wards. Australas J Ageing 22:39–40Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stephenson BJ, Rowe BH, Haynes RB, Macharia WM, Leon G (1993) Is this patient taking the treatment as prescribed? JAMA 269:2779–2781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Kurrle
    • 1
  • I. D. Cameron
    • 2
  • S. Quine
    • 3
  • R. G. Cumming
    • 3
  1. 1.Hornsby Ku-ring-gai HospitalHornsbyAustralia
  2. 2.Rehabilitation Studies UnitUniversity of SydneyRydeAustralia
  3. 3.School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations