Advertisement

Shock Waves

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 169–177 | Cite as

Investigation of shock focusing in a cavity with incident shock diffracted by an obstacle

  • Q. Zhang
  • X. Chen
  • L.-M. He
  • K. Rong
  • R. Deiterding
Original Article

Abstract

Experiments and numerical simulations were carried out in order to investigate the focusing of a shock wave in a test section after the incident shock has been diffracted by an obstacle. A conventional shock tube was used to generate the planar shock. Incident shock Mach numbers of 1.4 and 2.1 were tested. A high-speed camera was employed to obtain schlieren photos of the flow field in the experiments. In the numerical simulations, a weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme of third-order accuracy supplemented with structured dynamic mesh adaptation was adopted to simulate the shock wave interaction. Good agreement between experiments and numerical results is observed. The configurations exhibit shock reflection phenomena, shock–vortex interaction and—in particular—shock focusing. The pressure history in the cavity apex was recorded and compared with the numerical results. A quantitative analysis of the numerically observed shock reflection configurations is also performed by employing a pseudo-steady shock transition boundary calculation technique. Regular reflection, single Mach reflection and transitional Mach reflection phenomena are observed and are found to correlate well with analytic predictions from shock reflection theory.

Keywords

Shock focusing Shock diffraction WENO AMROC 

References

  1. 1.
    Sturtevant, B., Kulkarny, V.A.: The focusing of weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 651–671 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Izumi, K., Aso, S., Nishida, M.: Experimental and computational studies focusing process of shock waves reflected from parabolic reflectors. Shock Waves 3, 213–222 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kowalczyk, P., Platkowski, T., Walus, W.: Focusing of a shock wave in rarefied gas. Shock Waves 10, 77–93 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teng, H., Jiang, Z., Han, Z., Hosseini, S.H.R., Takayama, K.: Numerical investigation of toroidal shock wave focusing in a cylindrical chamber. Shock Waves 14, 299–305 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skews, B.W., Menon, N., Bredin, M., Timofeev, E.V.: An experiment on imploding conical shock waves. Shock Waves 11, 323–326 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paton, R.T., Skews, B.W., Rubidge, S., Snow, J.: Imploding conical shock waves. Shock Waves 23, 317–324 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hosseini, S.H.R., Takayama, K.: Experimental study of toroidal shock wave focusing in a compact vertical annular diaphragm-less shock tube. Shock Waves 20, 1–7 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eliasson, V., Apazidis, N., Tillmark, N., Lesser, M.B.: Focusing of strong shocks in an annular shock tube. Shock Waves 15, 205–217 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eliasson, V., Apazidis, N., Tillmark, N.: Controlling the form of strong converging shocks by means of disturbances. Shock Waves 17, 29–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eliasson, V., Tillmark, N., Szeri, J., Apazidis, N.: Light emission during shock wave focusing in air and argon. Phys. Fluids 19, 106106 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skews, B.W., Kleine, H.: Flow features resulting from shock wave impact on a cylindrical cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 481–493 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skews, B.W., Kleine, H., Barber, T., Iannuccelli, M.: New flow features in a cavity during shock wave impact. In: 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Gold Coast, Australia (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bond, C., Hill, D.J., Meiron, D.I., Dimotakis, P.E.: Shock focusing in a planar convergent geometry: experiment and simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 641, 297–333 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skews, B.W., Kleine, H., MacLucas, D., Takehara, K., Teranishi, H., Etoh, T.G.: Unsteady shock wave diagnostics with high-speed imaging. In: 28th Int. Congress on High-speed Imaging and Photonics, Canberra, Australia, November, 2008, vol. 7126, pp. 0F-1–0F-11 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacLucas, D., Skews, B.W.: Cavity shape effects on shock-induced pressure distributions. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Shock Waves, St Petersburg, Russia, pp. 282–287, 2009Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung, Y.G., Chang, K.S.: Shock focusing flow field simulated by a high-resolution numerical algorithm. Shock Waves 22, 641–645 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacLucas, D.A., Skews, B.W.: Kleine, H.: Time-resolved high-speed imaging of shock wave cavity interactions. In: 16th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, Okinawa, Japan, pp. 24–28 June (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levin, V.A., Nechaev, J.N., Tarasov, A.I.: A new approach to organizing operation cycles in pulse detonation engines. In: Roy, G., Frolov, S., Netzer, D., Borisov, A. (eds.) High-Speed Deflagration and Detonation: Fundamentals and Control. Moscow, pp. 223–238 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gelfand, B.E., Khomik, S.V., Bartenev, A.M., Medvedev, S.P., Grönig, H., Olivier, H.: Detonation and deflagration initiation at the focusing of shock waves in combustible gaseous mixture. Shock Waves 10, 197–204 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartenev, A.M., Khomik, S.V., Gelfand, B.E., Grönig, H., Olivier, H.: Effect of reflection type on detonation initiation at shock-wave focusing. Shock Waves 10, 205–215 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Achasov, O.V., Penyazkov O.G.: Some gas dynamic methods for control of detonation initiation and propagation. In: Roy, G., Frolov, S., Netzer, D., Borisov, A. (eds.) High Speed High-Speed Deflagration and Detonation: Fundamentals and Control, pp. 31–44. ELEX-KM Publishers, Moscow (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jackson, S.I., Shepherd, J.E.: Detonation initiation via imploding shock waves. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL. AIAA 2004–3919 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deiterding, R.: Block-structured adaptive mesh refinement–theory, implementation and application. ESAIM Proc. 34, 97–150 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deiterding, R., Radovitzki, R., Mauch, S.P., Cirak, F., Hill, D.J., Pantano, J.C., Cummings, J.C., Meiron, D.I.: Virtual Test Facility: a virtual shock physics facility for simulating the dynamic response of materials. http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/asc (2007)
  25. 25.
    Pantano, C., Deiterding, R., Hill, D.J., Pullin, D.I.: A low-numerical dissipation patch-based adaptive mesh refinement method for large-eddy simulation of compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 221(1), 63–87 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ziegler, J.L., Deiterding, R., Shepherd, J.E., Pullin, D.I.: An adaptive high-order hybrid scheme for compressive, viscous flows with detailed chemistry. J. Comput. Phys. 230, 7598–7630 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liepmann, H.W., Roshko, A.: Elements of Gasdynamics, p.778. Dover Pulications, Mineola (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deiterding, R.: A parallel adaptive method for simulating shock-induced combustion with detailed chemical kinetics in complex domains. Comput. Struct. 87, 769–783 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berger, M., Colella, P.: Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 64–84 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ben-Dor, G.: Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena. Springer, New York (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deiterding, R.: High-resolution numerical simulation and analysis of Mach reflection structures in detonation waves in low-pressure H\(_2\)–O\(_2\)–Ar mixtures: a summary of results obtained with the adaptive mesh refinement framework AMROC. J. Combust. 2011, 738969 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Q. Zhang
    • 1
  • X. Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • L.-M. He
    • 1
  • K. Rong
    • 1
  • R. Deiterding
    • 3
  1. 1.Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering Institute of Air Force Engineering UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-EngineBeijingChina
  3. 3.Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics Research GroupUniversity of Southampton, Highfield CampusSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations