Shock Waves

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 399–414 | Cite as

Numerical simulations of the early stages of high-speed droplet breakup

Original Article

Abstract

Experiments reported in the literature are reproduced using numerical simulations to investigate the early stages of the breakup of water cylinders in the flow behind normal shocks. Qualitative features of breakup observed in the numerical results, such as the initial streamwise flattening of the cylinder and the formation of tips at its periphery, support previous experimental observations of stripping breakup. Additionally, the presence of a transitory recirculation region at the cylinder’s equator and a persistent upstream jet in the wake is noted and discussed. Within the uncertainties inherent to the different methods used to extract measurements from experimental and numerical results, comparisons with experimental data of various cylinder deformation metrics show good agreement. To study the effects of the transition between subsonic and supersonic post-shock flow, we extend the range of incident shock Mach numbers beyond those investigated by the experiments. Supersonic post-shock flow velocities are not observed to significantly alter the cylinder’s behavior, i.e., we are able to effectively collapse the drift, acceleration, and drag curves for all simulated shock Mach numbers. Using a new method that minimizes noise errors, the cylinder’s acceleration is calculated; acceleration curves for all shock Mach numbers are subsequently collapsed by scaling with the pressure ratio across the incident shock. Furthermore, we find that accounting for the cylinder’s deformed diameter in the calculation of its unsteady drag coefficient allows the drag coefficient to be approximated as a constant over the initial breakup period.

Keywords

Breakup Deformation Droplet Shock–cylinder interaction Stripping Unsteady drag coefficient 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Vedran Coralic who developed the flow solver and graciously shared the source code with us. Also, our gratitude to Guillaume Blanquart for his insight and guidance in many useful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Aalburg, C., Leer, B.V., Faeth, G.M.: Deformation and drag properties of round drops subjected to shock-wave disturbances. AIAA J. 41(12), 2371–2378 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allaire, G., Clerc, S., Kokh, S.: A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 181, 577–616 (2002)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, H.: Two-dimensional simulation of stripping breakup of a water droplet. AIAA J. 46(5), 1135–1143 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coralic, V., Colonius, T.: Shock-induced collapse of a bubble inside a deformable vessel. Eur. J. Mech. B-Fluid 40, 64–74 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coralic, V., Colonius, T.: Finite-volume WENO scheme for viscous compressible multicomponent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 274, 95–121 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engel, O.G.: Fragmentation of waterdrops in the zone behind an air shock. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 60(3), 245–280 (1958)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gel’fand, B.E., Gubin, S.A., Kogarko, S.M., Komar, S.P.: Singularities of the breakup of viscous liquid droplets in shock waves. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 25(3), 1140–1142 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gojani, A.B., Ohtani, K., Takayama, K., Hosseini, S.H.R.: Shock Hugoniot and equations of states of water, castor oil, and aqueous solutions of sodium chloride, sucrose, and gelatin. Shock Waves 1–6 (2009). doi:10.1007/s00193-009-0195-9
  9. 9.
    Guildenbecher, D.R., López-Rivera, C., Sojka, P.E.: Secondary atomization. Exp. Fluids 46, 371–402 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, J., Tryggvason, G.: Secondary breakup of axisymmetric liquid drops. I. Acceleration by a constant body force. Phys. Fluids 11(12), 3650–3667 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han, J., Tryggvason, G.: Secondary breakup of axisymmetric liquid drops. II. impulsive acceleration. Phys. Fluids 13(6), 1554–1565 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanson, A.R., Domich, E.G., Adams, H.S.: Shock tube investigation of the breakup of drops by air blasts. Phys. Fluids 6(8), 1070–1080 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harlow, F.H., Amsden, A.A.: Fluid dynamics. Tech. Rep. LA-4700, LASL (1971)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirahara, H., Kawahashi, M.: Experimental investigation of viscous effects upon a breakup of droplets in high-speed air flow. Exp. Fluids 13, 423–428 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsiang, L.P., Faeth, G.M.: Near-limit drop deformation and secondary breakup. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18(5), 635–652 (1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsiang, L.P., Faeth, G.M.: Drop properties after secondary breakup. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 19(5), 721–735 (1993)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hsiang, L.P., Faeth, G.M.: Drop deformation and breakup due to shock wave and steady disturbances. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 21(4), 545–560 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Igra, D., Takayama, K.: Experimental and numerical study of the initial stages in the interaction process between a planar shock wave and a water column. In: Proc. 23rd Int. Symposium on Shock Waves, 5071. The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA., Fort Worth, Texas (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Igra, D., Takayama, K.: Numerical simulation of shock wave interaction with a water column. Shock Waves 11, 219–228 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Igra, D., Takayama, K.: A study of shock wave loading on a cylindrical water column. Tech. Rep. Vol. 13, pp. 19–36, Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Igra, D., Takayama, K.: Experimental investigation of two cylindrical water columns subjected to planar shock wave loading. J. Fluid Eng. T. ASME 125, 325–331 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnsen, E.: Numerical simulations of non-spherical bubble collapse with applications to shockwave lithotripsy. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnsen, E., Colonius, T.: Implementation of WENO schemes in compressible multicomponent flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 219, 715–732 (2006)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joseph, D.D., Belanger, J., Beavers, G.S.: Breakup of a liquid drop suddenly exposed to a high-speed airstream. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25, 1263–1303 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane, W.R.: Shatter of drops in streams of air. Ind. Eng. Chem. 43(6), 1312–1317 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ortiz, C., Joseph, D.D., Beavers, G.S.: Acceleration of a liquid drop suddenly exposed to a high-speed airstream. Int. J. Multiphase Flow Brief Commun. 30, 217–224 (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perigaud, G., Saurel, R.: A compressible flow model with capillary effects. J. Comput. Phys. 209, 139–178 (2005)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pilch, M., Erdman, C.A.: Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 13(6), 741–757 (1987)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quan, S., Schmidt, D.P.: Direct numerical study of a liquid droplet impulsively accelerated by gaseous flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 102103 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quirk, J.J., Karni, S.: On the dynamics of a shock-bubble interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 318, 129–163 (1996)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ranger, A.A., Nicholls, J.A.: Aerodynamic shattering of liquid drops. In: Proc. AIAA 6th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 68–83. AIAA, New York, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reinecke, W.G., Waldman, G.D.: A study of drop breakup behind strong shocks with applications to flight. Tech. Rep. SAMSO-TR-70-142, Air Force Systems Command (1970)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simpkins, P.G., Bales, E.L.: Water-drop response to sudden accelerations. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 629–639 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Takayama, K., Itoh, K.: Unsteady drag over cylinders and aerofoils in transonic shock tube flows. Tech. Rep. Vol. 51, Institute of High Speed Mechanics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (1986)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanno, H., Itoh, K., Saito, T., Abe, A., Takayama, K.: Interaction of a shock with a sphere suspended in a vertical shock tube. Shock Waves 13, 191–200 (2003). doi:10.1007/s00193-003-0209-y
  36. 36.
    Temkin, S., Kim, S.S.: Droplet motion induced by weak shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 133–157 (1980)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Temkin, S., Mehta, H.K.: Droplet drag in an accelerating and decelerating flow. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 297–313 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Theofanous, T.G.: Aerobreakup of Newtonian and viscoelastic liquids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 661–690 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Theofanous, T.G., Li, G.J.: On the physics of aerobreakup. Phys. Fluids 20, 052103 (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Theofanous, T.G., Mitkin, V.V., Ng, C.L., Chang, C.H., Deng, X., Sushchikh, S.: The physics of aerobreakup. II. viscous liquids. Phys. Fluids 24, 022104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thompson, K.W.: Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 68, 1–24 (1987)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thompson, K.W.: Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. II. J. Comput. Phys. 89, 439–461 (1990)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Toro, E.F., Spruce, M., Speares, W.: Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves 4, 25–34 (1994)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Welch, P., Boyle, P.: New turbines to enable efficient geothermal power plants. GRC Trans. 33, 765–772 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations