Shock Waves

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 483–493 | Cite as

Second-generation aerosol shock tube: an improved design

Original Article

Abstract

An improved, second-generation aerosol shock tube (AST II) has been developed for the study of the chemical kinetics of low-vapor-pressure fuels. These improvements enable a wider range of fuel concentrations and enhanced spatial uniformity relative to our initial aerosol shock tube (AST I). In addition, the design of AST II limits the aerosol loading zone in the shock tube to a fixed region (1.2 m in length adjacent to the shock tube endwall). AST II achieves these improvements using a separate holding tank to prepare the aerosol mixture and a slightly under-pressure dump tank to carefully pull the aerosol mixture into the tube in a plug-flow. This filling method is capable of producing room temperature test gas mixtures of n-dodecane with equivalence ratios of up to 3.0 in 21 % O2, three times the loading achievable in the earlier AST I that used a flow-through strategy. Improvements in aerosol uniformity were quantified by measuring the liquid volume concentration at multiple locations in the shock tube. The measurements made over a length of 1.1 m of shock tube indicate that the AST II method of filling produces non-uniformities in liquid volume concentration of less than 2 %, whereas in the AST I method of filling the non-uniformities reached 16 %. The improved uniformity can also be seen in measurement of gas-phase fuel concentration behind the incident shock wave after the liquid droplets have evaporated. Significant reduction in the scatter of ignition delay times measured using AST II have also been achieved, confirming the importance of uniform loading of the aerosol in making high-quality combustion measurements.

Keywords

Aerosol Shock tube Combustion Low-vapor pressure Dodecane Ignition delay times 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davidson D.F., Haylett D.R., Hanson R.K.: Development of an aerosol shock tube for kinetic studies of low-vapor-pressure fuels. Combust. Flame 155(1–2), 108–117 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haylett D.R., Lappas P.P., Davidson D.F., Hanson R.K.: Application of an aerosol shock tube to the measurement of diesel ignition delay times. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32, 477–484 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roth P.: The shock tube technique applied to study aerosol rate processes. Shock Waves 1, 73–82 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cadman P.: Shock tube combustion of liquid hydrocarbon sprays of toluene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 4301–4309 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rotavera, B., Amadio, A., Antonovski, V., Petersen, E.: New approaches for fundamental rocket injector studies using a shock tube. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 9–12 July 2006Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petersen E.L., Rickard M.J.A., Crofton M.W., Abbey E.D., Traum M.J., Kalitan D.M.: A facility for gas- and condensed-phase measurements behind shock waves. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 1716–1729 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Servaites J., Krier H., Melcher J.C., Burton R.L.: Ignition and combustion of aluminum particles in shocked H2O/O2/Ar and CO2/O2/Ar mixtures. Combust. Flame 125(1–2), 1040–1054 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bazyn T., Glumac N., Krier H., Ward T.S., Schoenitz M., Dreizin E.L.: Reflected shock ignition and combustion of aluminum and nanocomposite thermite powders. Combust. Sci. Technol. 179(3), 457–476 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glumac N., Krier H., Bazyn T., Eyer R.: Temperature measurements of aluminum particles burning in carbon dioxide. Combust. Sci. Technol. 177(3), 485–511 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalitan, D.M., Petersen, E.L.: A shock-tube study of aluminum oxidation at elevated temperatures. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 9–12 July 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falk T.J.: Evaporation of submicron platinum particles in a shock tube. J. Chem. Phys. 48, 3305 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidson D.F., Hanson R.K.: Interpreting shock tube ignition data. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 36(9), 510–523 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasu S.S., Davidson D.F., Hong Z., Vasudevan V., Hanson R.K.: n-Dodecane oxidation at high-pressures: measurements of ignition delay times and OH concentration time-histories. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32(1), 173–180 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute Annual Report 1995–1996: ITRI-148, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE AC04 76EV01013, Albuquerque, NM, December 1996Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, J.R.: Low-speed, low-cost wind tunnel. The Engineer, 481–483. 31 March 1967Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bae G.-N., Kinney P.D., Liu B.Y.H., Pui D.Y.H.: Investigation of aerosol spatial distributions downstream of a critical orifice at low pressure. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 28(6), 479–488 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sato S., Chen D.-R., Pui D.Y.H.: A novel method for producing spatially uniform aerosols in a low pressure environment. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36(2), 145–153 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanson, T.C.: The development of a facility and diagnostics for studying shock-induced behavior in micron-sized aerosols. Stanford Thesis, Dec 2005Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van de Hulst H.C.: Light Scattering by Small Particles. Wiley, New York (1957)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ren W., Jeffries J., Hanson R.: Temperature sensing in shock-heated evaporating aerosol using wavelength-modulation absorption spectroscopy of CO2 near 2.7 μm. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 105603 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sirjean, B., Dames, E., Sheen, D.A., You, X.-Q., Sung, C., Holley, A.T., Egolfopoulos, F.N., Wang, H., Vasu, S.S., Davidson, D.F., Hanson, R.K., Pitsch, H., Bowman, C.T., Kelley, A., Law, C.K., Tsang, W., Cernansky, N.P., Miller, D.L., Violi, A., Lindstedt, R.P.: A high-temperature chemical kinetic model of n-alkane oxidation. JetSurF version 1.0, September 15, 2009. http://melchior.usc.edu/JetSurF/Version1_0/Index.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Haylett
    • 1
  • D. F. Davidson
    • 1
  • R. K. Hanson
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations