Advertisement

Shock Waves

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 167–173 | Cite as

DDT in fuel–air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures

  • J. Card
  • D. Rival
  • G. Ciccarelli
Original Article

Abstract

An experimental study was carried out to investigate flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in fuel–air mixtures at initial temperatures up to 573 K and pressures up to 2 atm. The fuels investigated include hydrogen, ethylene, acetylene and JP-10 aviation fuel. The experiments were performed in a 3.1-m long, 10-cm inner-diameter heated detonation tube equipped with equally spaced orifice plates. Ionization probes were used to measure the flame time-of-arrival from which the average flame velocity versus propagation distance could be obtained. The DDT composition limits and the distance required for the flame to transition to detonation were obtained from this flame velocity data. The correlation developed by Veser et al. (run-up distance to supersonic flames in obstacle-laden tubes. In the proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions, France (2002)) for the flame choking distance proved to work very well for correlating the detonation run-up distance measured in the present study. The only exception was for the hydrogen–air data at elevated initial temperatures which tended to fall outside the scatter of the hydrocarbon mixture data. The DDT limits obtained at room temperature were found to follow the classical d/λ = 1 correlation, where d is the orifice plate diameter and λ is the detonation cell size. Deviations found for the high-temperature data could be attributed to the one-dimensional ZND detonation structure model used to predict the detonation cell size for the DDT limit mixtures. This simple model was used in place of actual experimental data not currently available.

Keywords

Deflagration-to-detonation transition Detonation Flame 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peraldi, O., Knystautas, R., Lee, J.H.S.: Criteria for transition to detonation in tubes. Proc. Combust. Inst. 21, 1629–1637 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, J.H.S., Knystautas, R., Chan, C.K.: Turbulent flame propagation in obstacle-filled tubes. Proc. Combust. Inst. 20, 1663–1672 (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schultz, E., Wintenberger, E., Shepherd, J.E.: Investigation of deflagration to detonation transition for application to pulse detonation engine ignition systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th JANNAF Propulsion Symposium. Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuznetsov, M.S., Alekseev, V.I., Dorofeev, S.: Comparison of critical conditions for DDT in regular and irregular cellular detonations systems. Shock Waves 10, 217–223 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciccarelli, G., Boccio, J., Ginsberg, T., Tagawa, H.: The influence of initial temperature on flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition. Proc. Combust. Inst. 26 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciccarelli, G., Dubocage, P.: Flame acceleration in fuel–air mixtures at elevated temperatures. AIAA/SAE/ASME Joint Propulsion Meeting. Indianapolis, IN (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciccarelli, G., Ginsberg, T., Boccio, J., Economos, C., Sato, K., Kinoshita, M.: Detonation cell size measurements and predictions in hydrogen–air mixtures at elevated temperature. Combust. Flame 99, 212–220 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glassman, I.: Combustion, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veser, A., Breitung, W., Dorofeev, S.: Run-up distance to supersonic flames in obstacle-laden tubes. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions. France (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law, C.K.: A compilation of experimental data on laminar burning velocities, Reduced kinetic mechanisms for application in combustion. In: Peters, N., Rogg, B. (eds.), pp. 15–26 Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gavrikov, A.I., Bezmelnitsyn, A.V., Leliakin, A.L., Dorofeev, S.B.: Extraction of basic flame properties from laminar flame speed calculations. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosive and Reactive Systems. Seattle, WA (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lui, D.D.S., MacFarlane, R.: Laminar burning velocities for hydrogen–air and hydrogen–air–steam flames. Combust. Flame 49, 59–71 (1983)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egolfopoulos, F.N., Law, C.K.: Chain mechanism in the overall reaction orders in laminar flame propagation. Combust. Flame 80, 7–16 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knystautas, R., Guirao, C., Lee, J.H., Sulmistras, A.: Measurement of cell size in hydrocarbon–air mixtures and predictions of critical tube diameter, critical initiation energy, and detonability limits. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 94, 23–37 (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Konnov, A.A., Development and Validation of a Detailed Reaction Mechanism for the Combustion Modeling. Eurasian Chemico-Technological J. 2, 257–264 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moen, I.O., Sulmistras, A., Thomas, G.O., Bjerketvedt, D., Thibault, P.A.: Influence of cellular regularity on the behavior of gaseous detonations. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosive and Reactive Systems. Berkely, CA (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ciccarelli, G.: Critical Tube measurements at elevated initial mixture temperatures. Combust. Sci. Technol. 174, 173–183 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Austin, J.M., Shepherd, J.E.: Detonation in hydrocarbon fuel blends. Combust. Flame 132(1–2), 79–90 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, F., Murray, S., Gerrard, K.: JP-10 Vapour Detonation at Elevated pressures and temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosive and Reactive Systems. Seattle, WA (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical and Materials Engineering DepartmentQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations