Advertisement

Long-term outcomes of retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence after a transobturator tape failure: a retrospective study

  • Jordi SabadellEmail author
  • Anabel Montero-Armengol
  • Nuria Rodríguez-Mias
  • Sabina Salicrú
  • Antonio Gil-Moreno
  • Jose L. Poza
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after a transobturator tape (TOT) failure is a controversial issue. There are few long-term data on the different treatment options. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of retropubic suburethral slings (RP-TVT) in this setting.

Methods

A descriptive retrospective study was performed among women with persistent/recurrent SUI treated at the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2014. All women were preoperatively evaluated to rule out complications of the first sling. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 1, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Outcomes were classified as cured, improved or failed.

Results

Forty-one women were operated on over the study period. The median follow-up time was 103.2 months. Likelihood to be cured or improved at 3, 5, 7 and 10 years was 78.0%, 75.4%, 71.9% and 67.4%, respectively. Absence of urethral hypermobility was the only variable related to RP-TVT failure. Complications during follow-up were observed in 39% of patients, although most of them were mild. However, two cases (4.9%) of vaginal exposure and three (7.3%) of lower urinary tract extrusion were observed. De novo urgency occurred 17.1% of women.

Conclusions

RP-TVT showed reasonable long-term effectiveness but had a high overall complication rate in the treatment of persistent/recurrent SUI after TOT. Expected outcomes and possible side effects should be discussed in detail during counseling before opting for a treatment option.

Keywords

Failure Recurrent Stress urinary incontinence Retropubic tape Midurethral sling Tension-free vaginal tape 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

JL Poza has received a speaker honorarium from Astellas Pharma outside the submitted work.

The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, et al. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD006375.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karmakar D, Mostafa A, Abdel-Fattah M. Long-term outcomes of transobturator tapes in women with stress urinary incontinence: E-TOT randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017;124:973–81.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmern PE, Gormley EA, Stoddard AM, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after burch and sling procedures. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:344–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tincello DG, Armstrong N, Hilton P, et al. Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:45–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3376-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giarenis I, Thiagamoorthy G, Zacchè M, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1285–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2696-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakali E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, Tincello DG. Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic suburethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;CD009407.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009407.pub2.
  7. 7.
    Nikolopoulos KI, Betschart C, Doumouchtsis SK. The surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:568–76.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haylen BT, Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Tension-free vaginal tape in the management of recurrent urodynamic stress incontinence after previous failed midurethral tape. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1450–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer F, Hermieu JF, Boyd A, et al. Repeat mid-urethral sling for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:817–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1941-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simsek A, Ozgor F, Kirecci SL, et al. Results of tension-free vaginal tape for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after unsuccessful transobturator tape surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1764–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabadell J, Poza JL, Esgueva A, et al. Usefulness of retropubic tape for recurrent stress incontinence after transobturator tape failure. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1543–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1490-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verbrugghe A, De Ridder D, Van der Aa F. A repeat mid-urethral sling as valuable treatment for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:999–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1971-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neuman M. The TVT procedure as second-line anti-incontinence surgery for TVT-obturator failure patients. J Pelvic Med Surg. 2006;12:161–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minassian VA, Yan X, Pilzek AL, et al. Does transition of urinary incontinence from one subtype to another represent progression of the disease? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1179–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3596-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lo T-S, Pue LB, Tan YL, Wu P-Y. Risk factors for failure of repeat midurethral sling surgery for recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:923–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2912-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smithling KR, Adams-Piper EE, Tran AAM, et al. Efficacy of repeat Midurethral sling for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A Fellows Pelvic Research Network Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000598.
  18. 18.
    Steele SE, Hill AJ, Unger CA. Concurrent midurethral sling excision or lysis at the time of repeat sling for treatment of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:285–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3385-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pradhan A, Jain P, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:831–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1803-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Doelen MJ, Withagen MIJ, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JPFA. Results of primary versus recurrent surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:997–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2627-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHospital Universitari Vall d’HebronBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations