Advertisement

Authors’ reply to letter from Schiøtz et al. on “Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology”

  • Abdelmageed AbdelrahmanEmail author
  • Ashleigh Moore
  • Ruben Trochez
Letter to the Editor
  • 30 Downloads

Dear Editor

We would like to thank Schiøtz et al. [1] for their interest in our editorial on the use of surgical databases in urogynaecology [2].

We are pleased to know that there is an established quality urogynaecology registry in Norway and that its use is compulsory. It is very encouraging to learn that the coverage rate is 98.5% and that it has achieved the highest possible quality rating in Norway. This should provide an excellent incentive to promote the use of surgical databases in our subspecialty.

Notes

Reference

  1. 1.
    Schiøtz HA, Svenningsen R, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Dimoski T. Re: Abdelrahman A, Moore A, Trochez R. Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04059-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdelrahman A, Moore A, Trochez R. Use of surgical databases in urogynaecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:851–2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03943-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdelmageed Abdelrahman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashleigh Moore
    • 2
  • Ruben Trochez
    • 1
  1. 1.Liverpool Women’s Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Poole Hospital NHS Foundation TrustPooleUK

Personalised recommendations