Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 12, pp 2127–2133 | Cite as

A pilot study on surgical reduction of the levator hiatus—the puborectalis sling

  • Vivien WongEmail author
  • Ka Lai Shek
  • Andrew Korda
  • Chris Benness
  • John Pardey
  • Hans Peter Dietz
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Female pelvic organ prolapse recurrence has been shown to be associated with levator hiatal distensibility. Reducing hiatal size surgically may reduce recurrence risk. This study aims to demonstrate a novel surgical procedure, the puborectalis sling (PR sling), designed to reduce the levator hiatal area, and to assess the medium-term safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

One hundred fifteen women undergoing prolapse repair with a pre-operative hiatal area on Valsalva of ≥ 35 cm2 were recruited into this phase 1 prospective multicentre pilot study. All underwent a PR sling procedure after completion of standard repairs. Primary outcome was levator hiatal area measured on ultrasound.

Results

One hundred ten patients were evaluated at least 3 months post-operatively. At 2.5 years average follow-up, there was an average of 12 cm2 (range 6–16 cm2) reduction in hiatal area from a mean pre-operative hiatal area of 43.9 (35–63) cm2. Thirty per cent (28/93) were symptomatic of prolapse, 66% (61/93) had clinical prolapse recurrence whilst 49% (46/93) had sonographic recurrence. Three patients required a return to theatre; one case of infection resulted in mesh removal, one had severe obstructed defecation requiring sling loosening and another had buttock pain with faecal impaction that resolved after manual disimpaction. There were no long-term sequelae.

Conclusions

The levator hiatal area can be reduced surgically, with almost 30% reduction in area seen in this pilot study. The reduction was significant and sustained up to 2 years with no major long-term complications.

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse Levator hiatal area 3D pelvic floor ultrasound Prolapse recurrence Mesh 

Abbreviations

Gh

Genital hiatus

Pb

Perineal body

POP

Pelvic organ prolapse

POPQ

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification

PR

Puborectalis

TOPAS

Transobturator Post-anal sling

US

United States of America

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

HP Dietz and KL Shek have received unrestricted educational grants from GE. No other conflicts of interest to declare by other authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Brubaker L, Maher C, Jacquetin B, Rajamaheswari N, von Theobald P, Norton P. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;16(1):9–19.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith F, Holman D, Moorin R, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1096–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hagen S, Stark D. Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD003882.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altman D, Väyrynen T, Ellström Engh M, Axelsen S, Falconer C. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. New Engl J Med. 2011;364:1826–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feiner B, Jelovsek J, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Model A, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Levator defects are associated with prolapse after pelvic floor surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:220–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL. Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong V, Shek K, Rane A, Goh J, Krause H, Dietz H. Is levator avulsion a predictor of cystocele recurrence following anterior vaginal mesh placement? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:230–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3475-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodrigo N, Wong V, Shek KL, Martin A, Dietz HP. The use of 3-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor to predict recurrence risk after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54:206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kearney R, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, Delancey J. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dietz H, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:707–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dietz H, Simpson J. Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115:979–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeLancey J, Morgan D, Fenner D, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller J, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shek K, Dietz H. Intrapartum risk factors of levator trauma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1485–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02704.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shek K, Chantarasorn V, Langer S, Dietz H. Does levator trauma ‘heal’? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:570–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenblatt P. Trans-obturator post-anal sling (TOPAS) procedure for fecal incontinence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:S152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerges B, Atan IK, Shek K, Dietz H. How to determine “ballooning” of the levator hiatus on clinical examination: a retrospective observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietz H. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dietz H. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: part 1: 2D aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dietz HP, Wong V, Shek KL. A simplified method for determining hiatal biometry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:540–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dietz H, Bernardo M, Kirby A, Shek K. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dietz H, Abbu A, Shek K. The Levator urethral gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:941–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zacharin RF, Hamilton NT. Pulsion enterocele: long-term results of an abdominoperineal technique. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55:141–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mellgren A, Zutshi M, Lucente VR, Culligan P, Fenner DE, Chern H, et al. A posterior anal sling for fecal incontinence: results of a 152-patient prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:349. e341–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barber MD. Symptoms and outcome measures of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:648–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nepean Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneyPenrithAustralia
  2. 2.Nepean HospitalUniversity of SydneyPenrithAustralia
  3. 3.Liverpool Clinical SchoolWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Royal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownAustralia
  5. 5.Nepean Private HospitalPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations