Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 12, pp 2157–2160 | Cite as

Is the belief that urinary incontinence is normal for ageing related to older Canadian women’s experience of urinary incontinence?

  • Christina Shaw
  • Saima Rajabali
  • Cara Tannenbaum
  • Adrian WaggEmail author
Original Article
  • 164 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Many women consider urinary incontinence (UI) a normal part of ageing. This belief may contribute to delays in treatment seeking. This study examined the relationship among holding that belief, UI type and severity, impact on quality of life, management and healthcare seeking in a sample of older community-dwelling Canadian women.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of a controlled trial examining the impact of continence promotion workshops on UI self-management. All women who consented and provided baseline data were included in this analysis regardless of eligibility for the main study.

Results

The sample included 4446 women (2022 with UI) of mean (SD) age 78.2 (9.0) years and BMI 26.6 (5.6). The belief that UI is normal for ageing was held by 2149 women [48.3% (83.7% of 1798 incontinent women)] and was not associated with age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 1.00 (0.99, 1.01), p = 0.72] or perception of overall health. Women with this belief had more impaired QoL compared with the women who felt UI was not normal for ageing [mean (SD) 83.9 (19.4) vs. 87.4 (18.6) (p < 0.01)]. This belief remained unaffected by daily UI and pad use up to 2/day.

Conclusions

More than two-thirds of women thought UI normal for ageing. This belief was not associated with age or perception of overall health. More severe incontinence and greater quantities of pad use did not make women less likely to hold this belief.

Keywords

Urinary incontinence Community dwelling Healthcare seeking Age Quality of life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Quazi Imaduddin Ibrahim for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

Funding

Funding provided by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) and Capital Health Endowed Research Funds.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Wagg has received funding from Astellas Pharma, Pfizer Corp., and Essity Heath & Hygiene AB for research, speaker honoraria and consultancy—none directly related to this paper.

Dr. Rajabali, Dr. Tannenbaum and Miss Shaw declare no financial conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams P, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper J, et al. Prevalence of female urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life in a cluster population in the United Kingdom (UK): a community survey. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(4):377–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith AP. Female urinary incontinence and wellbeing: results from a multi-national survey. BMC Urol. 2016;16:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kwak Y, Kwon H, Kim Y. Health-related quality of life and mental health in older women with urinary incontinence. Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(7):719–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wan X, et al. Disease stigma and its mediating effect on the relationship between symptom severity and quality of life among community-dwelling women with stress urinary incontinence: a study from a Chinese city. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(15-16):2170–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Omli R, et al. Urinary incontinence and risk of functional decline in older women: data from the Norwegian HUNT-study. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yazdany T, Bhatia N, Reina A. Association of depression and anxiety in underserved women with and without urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(6):349–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dugan E, et al. The association of depressive symptoms and urinary incontinence among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(4):413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thom DH, Haan MN, Van Den Eeden SK. Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality. Age Ageing. 1997;26(5):367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaw C, et al. Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms. Fam Pract. 2001;18(1):48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sexton CC, et al. The overlap of storage, voiding and postmicturition symptoms and implications for treatment seeking in the USA, UK and Sweden: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009;103(Suppl 3):12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horrocks S, et al. What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):689–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irwin DE, et al. Symptom bother and health care-seeking behavior among individuals with overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2008;53(5):1029–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perry S, et al. An epidemiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the community: the Leicestershire MRC incontinence study. Leicestershire MRC incontinence study team. J Public Health Med. 2000;22(3):427–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herschorn S, et al. A population-based study of urinary symptoms and incontinence: the Canadian urinary bladder survey. BJU Int. 2008;101(1):52–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tannenbaum C, et al. Continence across continents to upend stigma and dependency (CACTUS-D): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM. The I-QOL: a quality of life instrument specific to persons with urinary incontinence: user’s manual and scoring diskette for United States version. Seattle: Health Research Associates, Inc.; 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brookes ST, et al. A scored form of the Bristol female lower urinary tract symptoms questionnaire: data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wagner TH, et al. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. 1996;47(1):67–71 discussion 71-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warmoth K, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of ageing and their health and functioning: a systematic review of observational studies. Psychol Health Med. 2016;21(5):531–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andrews RM, et al. Positive aging expectations are associated with physical activity among urban-dwelling older adults. Gerontologist. 2017;57(suppl_2):S178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menkin JA, et al. Positive expectations regarding aging linked to more new friends in later life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72(5):771–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duffy OK, Iversen L, Hannaford PC. The impact and management of symptoms experienced at midlife: a community-based study of women in Northeast Scotland. BJOG. 2012;119(5):554–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kinchen KS, et al. Factors associated with women's decisions to seek treatment for urinary incontinence. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2003;12(7):687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Michel Saucier Chair of PharmacyUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations