Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 38 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
A frequent complication following vaginal hysterectomy is the formation of vaginal vault hematoma. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the impact of various interventions in reducing the incidence of vault hematoma or postoperative febrile morbidity following vaginal hysterectomy.
We carried out a systematic search of Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, HTA database, PROSPERO, meta-Register of Controlled Trials (mRCT), PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, conference abstracts, and a hand search of journals from inception until September 2018. Our search strategy included interventions in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with modified vault closure with inclusion of peritoneal edges, vaginal vault drainage, or vaginal packing to reduce the incidence of clinically significant vault hematomas. Two independent reviewers (SR and AD) extracted data using a structured proforma. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.
We identified two studies on modified vaginal vault closure incorporating peritoneal edges that reported a significant reduction in vault hematoma incidence. Meta-analysis of two randomized trials on vaginal drains showed no difference in postoperative febrile morbidity secondary to vault hematoma [risk ratio (RR) 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.43–1.50]. Similar results were seen on meta-analysis of four randomized trials on the use of vaginal packing (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.43–1.50).
Inclusion of peritoneal edges in vaginal vault closure may reduce the incidence of vault hematoma. The routine use of vaginal vault drainage and/or packing has not shown to reduce vault hematoma incidence or postoperative febrile morbidity. We recommend a change of practice to include peritoneal edges in vault closure based on the evidence available in our systematic review.
KeywordsVaginal hysterectomy Packing Drain Systematic review Vaginal cuff closure Vault hematoma
We thank Professor Bob Freeman for his input into the preparation of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Details of ethical approval
Ethical approval was not required as this is a systematic review of published manuscripts.
- 13.Wells G, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
- 14.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:MR000035.Google Scholar
- 17.Baumgarten M, Vos C, Vervest H. Short term postoperative complications after vaginal packing, a randomised controlled study. In: ICS, Toronto, Canada. 2010.Google Scholar
- 21.Urzua M, Astorquiza MRC, Braun H. Post vaginal hysterectomy packing, is it worth? Prospective randomised study. In: IUGA Annual Meeting, Dublin, Ireland. 2013.Google Scholar
- 25.Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-risk of bias and indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013.
- 26.Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Akl EA, Hazlewood G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.011.