Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 301–305 | Cite as

Comparing postoperative voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling using either a Babcock or Kelly clamp tensioning technique

  • Olivia H. Chang
  • Michele R. Hacker
  • Peter L. Rosenblatt
  • Dayna Neo
  • Emily Von Bargen
  • Iman Berrahou
  • Amy Le
  • Roger Lefevre
  • Lekha S. HotaEmail author
Original Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to compare postoperative urinary retention using the Babcock and Kelly clamps for retropubic midurethral sling (RPS) tensioning.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort of isolated RPS procedures from December 2010 through April 2016 by five fellowship-trained surgeons at two institutions. Slings were tensioned with a Babcock clamp by grasping a 3-mm midline fold of mesh (RPS-B) or a Kelly clamp as a spacer between the sling and suburethral tissue (RPS-K). Assessment of urinary retention included the primary outcome of postoperative catheterization and several secondary outcomes, including discharge home with a catheter, within 1 year of surgery. Analysis of covariance was used to compute the mean difference in duration of catheterization and log-binomial regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

We included 240 patients. The RPS-B group had a lower body mass index and was more likely to be menopausal, have had pelvic organ prolapse surgery, and have a lower maximum urethral closure pressure than the RPS-K group. The mean duration of catheterization was similar, as demonstrated by the crude (0.21 days [−0.30–0.71]) and BMI-adjusted (0.07 days [−0.41–0.55]) mean difference in duration of catheterization. The incidence of postoperative OAB symptoms was comparable between the groups (BMI-adjusted RR: 0.95 (0.80–1.1)), and the incidence of revision did not differ (p = 0.7).

Conclusions

The Babcock and Kelly clamp tensioning techniques appear comparable, with a low incidence of prolonged postoperative catheterization. Most catheters were removed on the day of the surgery. It is reasonable to tension retropubic midurethral slings with either method.

Keywords

Retropubic midurethral sling Sling tensioning Urinary retention Sling revision 

Notes

Funding

This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102), and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

PR is a consultant and has received research support from Boston Scientific and Coloplast. For the remaining authors no conflicts of interest were declared.

References

  1. 1.
    ACOG, AUGS. Practice Bulletin 155—Urinary Incontinence in Women. https://www.acog.org/-/media/Practice-Bulletins/Committee-on-Practice-Bulletins----Gynecology/pb155.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20161127T1754149626. Accessed 27 November 2016.
  2. 2.
    Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of incontinence in the county of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(11):1150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labrie J, Berghmans BLCM, Fischer K, et al. Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1124–33.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1210627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81–5. discussion 85–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD006375.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD006375.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dyrkorn OA, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Sandvik L. TVT compared with TVT-O and TOT: results from the Norwegian National Incontinence Registry. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1321–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1195-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norton PA, Nager CW, Chai TC, et al. Risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after midurethral sling. Urology. 2013;82(5):1038–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sokol AI, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD, Paraiso MFR, Barber MD. Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1537–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walters MD, Karram M. Chapter 20: Synthetic midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. In: Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. p. 272–294. https://www-clinicalkey-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/#!/content/book/3-s2.0-B9780323113779000207?scrollTo=%23s0020. Accessed 30 November 2016.
  11. 11.
    Hong B, Park S, Kim HS, Choo M. Factors predictive of urinary retention after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170(3):852–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000081095.85420.ab.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003;44(6):724–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dmochowski RR, Blaivas JM, Gormley EA, et al. Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1906–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bodelsson G, Henriksson L, Osser S, Stjernquist M. Short term complications of the tension free vaginal tape operation for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJOG. 2002;109(5):566–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boston Scientific. Advantage Fit, transvaginal mid-urethral sling system. 2013. http://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/portfolio-group/sling-systems/advantage-fit/Advantage-Fit-Brochure.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2016.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Ethicon. Gynecare TVT—tension-free vaginal tape. 2015. http://hostedvl106.quosavl.com/qb/doc/0nnlfm86hbpkf33bt7pl38flvg.
  18. 18.
    Duckett JRA, Tamilselvi A. Effect of tension-free vaginal tape in women with a urodynamic diagnosis of idiopathic detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. BJOG. 2006;113(1):30–3.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00810.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zyczynski HM, Albo ME, Goldman HB, et al. Change in overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(2):423–30.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive BiologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMount Auburn HospitalCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations