Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 293–300 | Cite as

Bladder management during pregnancy in women with spinal-cord injury: an observational, multicenter study

  • Elena AndrettaEmail author
  • Lorenza Maria Landi
  • Mirella Cianfrocca
  • Alberto Manassero
  • Oreste Risi
  • Giorgio Artuso
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Pregnancy in women with spinal-cord injury (SCI) poses a clinical challenge. We hypothesized that changes in the management of neurogenic bladder during pregnancy are commonly required and should receive more attention.

Methods

Data were collected by retrospective analysis of medical records and via cross-sectional survey of 52 women with SCI, representing 67 pregnancies, at ten Italian neurourological clinics. All participants provided informed consent.

Results

Between 1976 and 2013, 39 participants had one child, 11 had two children, and two had three children. Mean age at the time of SCI was 18 years and at the time of first pregnancy was 30 years. Delivery occurred from weeks 32 to 40 in 98% of first and second pregnancies, and 94% of neonates were healthy. Oxybutynin was used by four women during five pregnancies, which resulted in delivery of healthy babies. Intermittent catheterization was used before 54% of first pregnancies and 39% of second pregnancies. Bladder management was altered during 45% of these pregnancies, and the most common changes were increased use or frequency of intermittent catheterization or use of an indwelling catheter. Urinary tract infections occurred in 48% of pregnancies, and an irregular course was reported in 13% of pregnancies mainly related to tetraplegia and urological complications.

Conclusions

Pregnancy in women with SCI generally has good outcomes and limited risks but frequently necessitates changes in the management of neurogenic bladder. High levels of awareness and focused monitoring of bladder issues are recommended.

Keywords

Bladder management Lower urinary tract symptoms Pregnancy Spinal cord injury Urinary tract infection 

Abbreviations

LUTS

lower urinary tract symptoms

SCI

spinal-cord injury

UTI

urinary tract infection

Notes

Acknowledgements

M Åström (StatCons, Sweden) contributed to the statistical analyses and guidance, P Signani (Wellspect HealthCare, Italy) contributed to the study setup and database preparation, and M Åberg Håkansson (Wellspect HealthCare, Sweden) contributed to the manuscript preparation.

Funding

The study was partially sponsored by Wellspect HealthCare, DENTSPLY IH AB, Sweden, but there was no specific compensation related to its publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

Previous presentation

Parts of this work were presented at the ISCoS and ASIA Joint Scientific Meeting held 14–16 May in Montreal, Canada.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization: International perspectives on spinal cord injury www.who.int (2013).
  2. 2.
    Taweel WA, Seyam R. Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Res Rep Urol. 2015;7:85–99.  https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S29644.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghidini A, Healey A, Andreani M, Simonson MR. Pregnancy and women with spinal cord injuries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(10):1006–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802356909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, Shinowara NL, Blackwell SC. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):935–47.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182118d59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pannek J, Bertschy S. Mission impossible? Urological management of patients with spinal cord injury during pregnancy: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(10):1028–32.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bughi S, Shaw SJ, Mahmood G, Atkins RH, Szlachcic Y. Amenorrhea, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes in women following spinal cord injury: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Endocr Pract: Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2008;14(4):437–41.  https://doi.org/10.4158/ep.14.4.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skowronski E, Hartman K. Obstetric management following traumatic tetraplegia: case series and literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(5):485–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00909.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iezzoni LI, Chen Y, McLain AB. Current pregnancy among women with spinal cord injury: findings from the US national spinal cord injury database. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(11):821–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker ER, Cardenas DD. Pregnancy in spinal cord injured women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(5):501–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bertschy S, Bostan C, Meyer T, Pannek J. Medical complications during pregnancy and childbirth in women with SCI in Switzerland. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(3):183–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Westgren N, Hultling C, Levi R, Westgren M. Pregnancy and delivery in women with a traumatic spinal cord injury in Sweden, 1980-1991. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(6):926–30.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le Liepvre H, Dinh A, Idiard-Chamois B, Chartier-Kastler E, Phe V, Even A, et al. Pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women, a cohort study of 37 pregnancies in 25 women. Spinal Cord. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.138.
  13. 13.
    Bertschy S, Geyh S, Pannek J, Meyer T. Perceived needs and experiences with healthcare services of women with spinal cord injury during pregnancy and childbirth - a qualitative content analysis of focus groups and individual interviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:234.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0878-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitra M, Long-Bellil LM, Iezzoni LI, Smeltzer SC, Smith LD. Pregnancy among women with physical disabilities: unmet needs and recommendations on navigating pregnancy. Disabil Health J. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.12.007.
  15. 15.
    Pebdani RN, Johnson KL, Amtmann D. Personal experiences of pregnancy and fertility in individuals with spinal cord injury. Sex Disabil. 2014;32(1):65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-013-9319-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McLain AB, Massengill T, Klebine P. Pregnancy and women with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(3):497–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG committee opinion. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Number 275, September 2002. Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):189–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Craig DI. The adaptation to pregnancy of spinal cord injured women. Rehabil Nurs Off J Assoc Rehabil Nurses. 1990;15(1):6–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cross LL, Meythaler JM, Tuel SM, Cross AL. Pregnancy, labor and delivery post spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1992;30(12):890–902.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc1992166.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michau A, Dinh A, Denys P, Levy J, Chartier-Kastler E, Bernard L, et al. Control cross-sectional study evaluating an antibiotic prevention strategy in 30 pregnancies under clean intermittent self-catheterization and review of literature. Urology. 2016;91:58–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van der Bom JG, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. How do the prevalences of urogenital symptoms change during pregnancy? Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(2):135–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nel JT, Diedericks A, Joubert G, Arndt K. A prospective clinical and urodynamic study of bladder function during and after pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(1):21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macejko AM, Schaeffer AJ. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Urol Clin N Am. 2007;34(1):35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2006.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edwards JA, Reid YJ, Cozens DD. Reproductive toxicity studies with oxybutynin hydrochloride. Toxicology. 1986;40(1):31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koc O, Duran B. Role of elective cesarean section in prevention of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(5):318–23.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283573fcb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R, Karsenty G, Kessler TM, Schneider M, 't Hoen L, Blok B. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):324–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    World Health Organization: Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. www.who.int (2014).
  28. 28.
    Morgan JC, Iyer SS, Moser ET, Singer C, Sethi KD. Botulinum toxin a during pregnancy: a survey of treating physicians. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(1):117–9.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.063792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Nieuwkoop C, den Exter PL, Elzevier HW, den Hartigh J, van Dissel JT. Intravesical gentamicin for recurrent urinary tract infection in patients with intermittent bladder catheterisation. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36(6):485–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lamin E, Newman DK. Clean intermittent catheterization revisited. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(6):931–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1236-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urology DepartmentGeneral HospitalVeniceItaly
  2. 2.Montecatone Rehabilitation InstituteBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Spinal UnitCTO HospitalRomeItaly
  4. 4.Neuro-Urology DepartmentTorinoItaly
  5. 5.Neuro-Urology UnitBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations