Help-seeking behaviour for pelvic floor dysfunction in women over 55: drivers and barriers
- 257 Downloads
Our aim was to identify drivers of and barriers to help-seeking behaviour of older women with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) living independently in Australia .
Women aged ≥55 years were recruited to this cross-sectional study during July and August 2016. Bladder, bowel, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and sexual dysfunction were assessed with the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (APFQ). Drivers and barriers were based on the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire. Univariate analyses were used to assess any significant relationships between PFD, age, education level, self-reported PFD, barriers and drivers.
Of the 376 study participants [mean, standard deviation (SD) age 68.6 (10.5) years], 67% reported symptoms of PFD and 98.7% scored >0 on the APFQ. Women were more likely to seek help if they scored higher on the APFQ (p < 0.001). The main barrier to seeking help was the perception that PFD was a normal part of ageing (22.4%). Of those who did seek help (50%), the main factor was increased level of symptom bother (51.4%). There was no difference in age or education level between women who did and did not seek help.
Women are more likely to seek help for PFD if scoring higher on the APFQ or symptoms are becoming more bothersome. They are less likely to seek help if they view their symptoms as normal. Future direction should be taken to raise awareness of normal pelvic floor function as well as the availability of help for PFD.
KeywordsHelp-seeking Pelvic floor Dysfunction Barriers Drivers Women
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Pelvic organ prolapse
Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire
Pelvic floor muscle
Pelvic floor muscle training
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Terese Fisher, RAAFA, Merriwa and the staff at St Ives, Murdoch and Long Island Village, VIC, Australia.
There is no funding associated with this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
- 2.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australian's health. <http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129548150>, 2014 (accessed 20/3/2016.).
- 8.Meyer I, Richter H. Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment in women. Womens Health. 2015;11(2):225–38.Google Scholar
- 9.Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwright R, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, et al. Committe 1: epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ Prolpase (POP) and anal incontinence (AI). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khourny S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence 5th international consultation on incontinence. Commitee 1. Paris: ICUD-EAU; 2013. p. 15–107.Google Scholar
- 14.K. Chin Huang. Health care-seeking behaviors among women suffering from urinary incontinence. J Yoga Phys Ther. 2016;06(01).Google Scholar
- 18.Nicolosi A, Laumann E, Glasser D, Brock G, King R, Gingell C. Sexual activity, sexual disorders and associated help-seeking behaviour among mature adults in five Anglophone countries from the global Servey of sexual attitudes and Behaviours (GSSAB). J Sex Marital Ther. 2006;32(4):331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.A. Adelowo, E. O'Neal, L. Hota. Underlying factors contributing to the delay in patients seeking Care for Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. J Clin Trials. 2014;4(4).Google Scholar
- 28.A. Taylor, K. Price, T. Gill, R. Adams, R. Pilkington, N. Carrangis, et al. Multimorbidity - not just an older person's issue. Results from an Australian biomedical study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(718).Google Scholar