Advertisement

Development and validity of a questionnaire for coital urinary incontinence: clinical and urodynamic analysis

  • Fatih TarhanEmail author
  • Pınar Ay
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To develop and validate a questionnaire (coital incontinence questionnaire-CIQ) for CI and perform clinical and urodynamic analysis of patients with CI.

Methods

A total of 414 female patients with urinary incontinence undergoing urodynamics were included in this study. All patients were evaluated with a detailed history, questionnaires, physical examination, relevant laboratory tests and urodynamics. Content, construct and convergent validity of the questionnaire were evaluated. Patients were divided into groups: with CI (group 1) and without CI (group 2).

Results

Overall test-retest reliability coefficients of CIQ were high (r = 0.968, p = 0.01), and the internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha, 0.964). The test-retest scores did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.158). Approximately 34% of these women had CI. Body mass index (BMI), parity, daily incontinence episodes, daily pad counts and 1-h pad test results were higher in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that a daily incontinence episode, BMI, maximum cystometric capacity and PdetQmax were statistically significant factors associated with CI. Urinary incontinence types were different between groups (p < 0.0001). Incontinence with both penetration and orgasm was the most common form of CI (54.4%), and CI severity differed significantly among the forms of CI (p = 0.007). CI negatively interferes with patients’ sexual life, their relationship with their partner and quality of life in most patients.

Conclusions

The CIQ is a reliable, valid and useful tool for assessment of all aspects of CI in women. CI seems to be related to the severity of urinary incontinence. Further studies are needed to clarify this subject.

Keywords

Coital incontinence Quality of life Questionnaire Sexuality Urodynamics Validation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Sena Tokay for language editing of the manuscript and Ms. Nuriye Durmaz for data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moller LA, Lose G, Jorgensen T. The prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40–60 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(4):298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El-Azab AS, Yousef HA, Seifeldein GS. Coital incontinence: relation to detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(4):520–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madhu C, Hashim H, Enki D, Yaasin M, Drake M. Coital incontinence: what can we learn from urodynamic assessment? Urology. 2015;85(5):1034–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espuña Pons M, PuigClota M. Coital urinary incontinence: impact on quality of life as measured by the King’s health questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(5):621–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kizilkaya Beji N, Yalcin O, Ayyildiz EH, Kayir A. Effect of urinary leakage on sexual function during sexual intercourse. Urol Int. 2005;74(3):250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oh SJ, Choo MS, Kim HS, Kim JC, Lee JG, Yun JM, et al. Generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life in women with coital incontinence: a prospective, multicenter study. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2008;65(1):62–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jha S, Strelley K, Radley S. Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(5):633–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vierhout ME, Gianotten WL. Mechanisms of urine loss during sexual activity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;52(1):45–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Emery J, Book NM, Novi JM. The association between post-void leakage and coital incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency among women with urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(6):349–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Khullar V, Cardozo L, et al. Urinary incontinence at orgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):911–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hilton P. Urinary incontinence during sexual intercourse: a common, but rarely volunteered, symptom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(4):377–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moran PA, Dwyer PL, Ziccone SP. Urinary leakage during coitus in women. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19(3):286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lau HH, Huang WC. Su TH. Urinary leakage during sexual intercourse among women with incontinence: incidence and risk factors. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177075.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordon D, Groutz A, Sinai T, Wiezman A, Lessing JB, David MP, et al. Sexual function in women attending a urogynecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J. 1999;10(5):325–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grzybowska ME, Wydra DG. Coital incontinence: a factor for deteriorated health-related quality of life and sexual function in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(5):697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gray T, Li W, Campbell P, Jha S, Radley S. Evaluation of coital incontinence by electronic questionnaire: prevalence, associations and outcomes in women attending a urogynaecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(7):969–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Nappi RE, Bolis P. Female urinary incontinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem for women’s sexuality. J Sex Med. 2009;6(1):40–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14(3):164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, Corey R, Stewart W, Bentkover J, et al. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(6):563–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mendez MH, Sexton SJ, Lentz AC. Contemporary review of male and female climacturia and urinary leakage during sexual activities. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6(1):16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munaganuru N, Van Den Eeden SK, Creasman J, Subak LL, Strano-Paul L, Huang AJ. Urine leakage during sexual activity among ethnically diverse, community-dwelling middle-aged and older women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):439.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nygaard I, Milburn A. Urinary incontinence during sexual activity: prevalence in a gynecologic practice. J Women’s Health. 1995;4(1):83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Faix A, Lapray JF, Callede O, Maubon A, Lanfrey K. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sexual intercourse: second experience in missionary position and initial experience in posterior position. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(Suppl 1):63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinics of UrologyUniversity of Health Sciences Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Training and Research HospitalKartalTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthMarmara University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations