Randomized controlled trial of the effect of environment on patient embarrassment and anxiety with urodynamics
- 143 Downloads
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
In previous survey studies, women undergoing urodynamic testing (UDT) have reported bother and embarrassment and have provided suggestions for improving the experience. The suggestions include audio distraction and increased privacy, neither of which have been prospectively examined. We report a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the hypothesis that an improved ambience can decrease UDT-related embarrassment and anxiety.
Methods
A total of 60 participants were recruited to achieve an 80% power to detect a conservative 20-point difference with a significance level of 0.05. Eligible participants were randomized to one of two conditions: dim lighting with light instrumental music (modified group, 30 patients), or no music and standard lighting (standard group, 30 patients). The aim of the dim lighting and music was to provide an increased sense of privacy and audio distraction based on participant feedback in previous studies.
Results
The study was complete with 60 participants. Patients in both groups reported less embarrassment after UDT. However, patients in the modified group showed a greater decrease in embarrassment scores (9.72 mm) than patients in the standard group (1.3 mm; p = 0.33). Although the study was under-powered, the difference found approached clinical significance.
Conclusions
Simply dimming the lights and providing music during UDT resulted in a decrease in embarrassment scores of almost ten points. This low-cost and simple measure improved patient experience.
Keywords
Ambience Anxiety Embarrassment Environment Experience UrodynamicsNotes
Acknowledgements
This study was done with the support of the urogynecology nurses, research staff and residents in training at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
None.
Funding
None.
Grants
CTSI grant UL1TR000124: RedCap Program for Data Entry.
References
- 1.Yiou R, Audureau E, Loche CM, Dussaud M, Lingombet O, Binhas M. Comprehensive evaluation of embarrassment and pain associated with invasive urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(2):156–60. doi: 10.1002/nau.22521.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ku JH, Kim SW, Kim HH, Paick JS, Son H, Oh SJ. Patient experience with a urodynamic study: a prospective study in 208 patients. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 1):2307–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Yokoyama T, Nozaki K, Nose H, Inoue M, Nishiyama Y, Kumon H. Tolerability and morbidity of urodynamic testing: a questionnaire-based study. J Urol. 2005;66(1):74–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Yeung JY, Eschenbacher MA, Pauls RN. Pain and embarrassment associated with urodynamic testing in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):645–50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2261-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(4):287–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients’ anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:706–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(4):485–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar