Prevalence of, and risk factors for, symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in Rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey study
- 184 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
The prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), diagnosed by a pre-tested structured questionnaire, is unknown in Bangladesh. We investigated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, symptomatic POP in women in rural Bangladesh, recruited from the community.
A cross-sectional survey of 787 women aged over 15 years was conducted in four villages in one district in rural Bangladesh. The prevalence of symptomatic POP and the risk factors associated with the condition was investigated, using Chi-squared and multivariate logistic regression.
The prevalence of symptomatic POP was 15.6 %. The mean age of participants was 40.1 (±9.0) years. Women aged 35–44 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.96, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.03–3.73) and ≥45 years (OR 2.95, 95 % CI 1.62–5.38) were more likely to have POP compared with women aged ≤35 years. Having POP was positively associated with women having ≥5 children (OR 4.34, 95 % CI 1.39–13.58), having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; OR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.02–4.21), and women having constipation (OR 3.54, 95 % CI 1.87–6.72). Women whose husband had >5 years of schooling were less likely to have POP (OR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.19–0.73) compared with women whose husband had no schooling.
Symptomatic POP affects a substantial proportion of women in rural Bangladesh and increases with age. Parity, COPD, constipation and husband’s education are associated with POP, all of which have the potential to be modified. Thus, interventions targeting these risk factors to prevent the condition are urgently needed in Bangladesh.
KeywordsPrevalence Pelvic organ prolapse Risk factors Bangladesh
We thank our research assistant for her sincere efforts in data collection and the rural women of Bangladesh for participating in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 6.Shrestha B, Onta S, Choulagai B, Poudyal A, Pahari DP, Uprety A, Petzold M, Krettek A (2014) Women’s experiences and health care-seeking practices in relation to uterine prolapse in a hill district of Nepal. BMC Womens Health 14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-20 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Begum S, Sharmin S, Sultana P, Chowdhury A, Nabi S, Uddin M, Hasan M (2012) Clinical profile and management of uterovaginal prolapse with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS). Bangladesh J Urol 14(1):26–30Google Scholar
- 11.Kishwara S, Tanira S, Omar E, Begum K (2010) Genital prolapse in women of reproductive age group in a rural community of Bangladesh. J Dhaka Med Coll 19(2):118–121Google Scholar
- 12.Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2014) Population and housing census 2011: socio-economic and demographic report. National Series, volume 4. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) Ministry of Planning Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Available at: http://184.108.40.206/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/BBS/Socio_Economic.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2014
- 13.World Health Organization (1990) Measuring reproductive morbidity: Report of a technical working group. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/61306/1/WHO_MCH_90.4.pdf. Accessed 11 January 2013
- 14.Barber MD, Walters MD, Cundiff GW, Group PT (2006) Responsiveness of the pelvic floor distress inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(5):1492–1498. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar