Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 1591–1596 | Cite as

Obstetric anal sphincter injury: a follow-up questionnaire study on longer-term outcomes

  • Simone Cornelisse
  • Linda Petra Arendsen
  • Sander Martijn Job van Kuijk
  • Kirsten Birgit Kluivers
  • Jeroen van Dillen
  • Mirjam WeemhoffEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) contribute significantly to the development of anal incontinence (AI) in women. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of AI after OASIS and to study the influence on the quality of life (QoL) in patients with OASIS.

Methods

This cohort study, with prospective case-control follow-up, involves women who were treated for OASIS between 2005 and 2012 in two academic medical centers in The Netherlands. Three hundred and thirteen patients and 780 controls were invited to complete a validated questionnaire (Defecation Distress Inventory, Wexner Incontinence Score, and Fecal Instrument Quality of Life) regarding symptoms and bother of AI subsequent and QoL after delivery. The main outcome measures were the presence of AI and the impact on QoL.

Results

The questionnaire was completed by 141 patients and 194 controls. Mean follow-up was 4 years (range 1–9 years) in both groups. In the patient group, 55 women (39 %) reported AI symptoms compared with 38 women (20 %) in the control group (odds ratio 2.7, 95 % confidence interval 1.66–4.47, p < 0.01). In women who experienced symptoms of AI as very bothersome, QoL was affected in 14 (82.0 %) patients and three (33.5 %) controls (p = 0.012).

Conclusions

In this study, women with OASIS had a more than doubled risk of longer-term bothersome symptoms of AI compared with controls. Symptoms were experienced as bothersome and as having an influence on QoL.

Keywords

Anal incontinence Follow-up Obstetric anal sphincter injury Quality of life 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Details of ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Board form the Maastricht University Medical Centre on 06-06-2014 (REB number:14-02-002)

The Medical Ethics board of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, gave approval to the study design without submission of the protocol.

References

  1. 1.
    Nederland Stichting Perinatale Registratie. (Dutch foundation of Perinatal Registry) Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2013. http://www.perinatreg.nl/uploads/150/153/PRN_jaarboek_2013_09122014.pdf Accessed 1 feburary 2015
  2. 2.
    Richtlijn. Totaalruptuur 2013. (Guideline of obstetric anal sphincter injury). Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie 2013. http://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/totaalruptuur/risicofactoren_en_preventie_van_totaalruptuur.html Accessed 1 july 2015
  3. 3.
    Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjödahl R, Berg G (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG 112(3):312–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marsh F, Lynne R, Christine L, Alison W (2011) Obstetric anal sphincter injury in the UK and its effect on bowel, bladder and sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 154(2):223–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reid AJ, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Roos AM, Thakar R (2014) Outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after three years. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: Off Organ Int Federation Gynaecol Obstet 127(1):47–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wegnelius G, Hammarstrom M (2011) Complete rupture of anal sphincter in primiparas: long-term effects and subsequent delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(3):258–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1998) Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 85(10):1433–1438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC, Hop WC, Wallenburg HC (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(9):830–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayden DM, Weiss EG (2011) Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(1):64–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Visscher AP, Lam TJ, Hart N, Felt-Bersma RJ (2014) Fecal incontinence, sexual complaints, and anorectal function after third-degree obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 25(5):607–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samarasekera DN, Bekhit MT, Wright Y, Lowndes RH, Stanley KP, Preston JP, Preston P, Speakman CT (2008) Long-term anal continence and quality of life following postpartum anal sphincter injury. Color Dis 10(8):793–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01445.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sultan AH (1999) Editorial: obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 5:193–196Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16, discussion 16-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bols EM, Hendriks HJ, Berghmans LC, Baeten CG, de Bie RA (2013) Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):469–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyer I, Richter HE (2014) An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep 3(3):155–164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2002) AI after childbirth. CMAJ 166(3):326–330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A (2015) Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Women’s Health 60(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evers EC, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Handa VL (2012) Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5–10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):425–e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.055 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norderval S, Markskog A, Røssaak K, Vonen B (2008) Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(1):78–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2010) Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):368–374. doi: 10.1002/uog.7512 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L, Kirwan C, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell PR (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217–e1-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jameson JS, Chia YW, Kamm MA, Speakman CT, Chye YH, Henry MM (1994) Effect of age, sex and parity on anorectal function. Br J Surg 81(11):1689–1692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fox JC, Fletcher JG, Zinsmeister AR, Seide B, Riederer SJ, Bharucha AE (2006) Effect of aging on anorectal and pelvic floor functions in females. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1726–1735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW (2008) Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: fecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG 115(2):234–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Cornelisse
    • 1
  • Linda Petra Arendsen
    • 2
  • Sander Martijn Job van Kuijk
    • 3
  • Kirsten Birgit Kluivers
    • 4
  • Jeroen van Dillen
    • 4
  • Mirjam Weemhoff
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyMedical University Centre MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA)Maastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyZuyderland ziekenhuisHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations