Assessment of urethral support using MRI-derived computational modeling of the female pelvis
- 438 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
This study aimed to assess the role of individual anatomical structures and their combinations to urethral support function.
A realistic pelvic model was developed from an asymptomatic female patient’s magnetic resonance (MR) images for dynamic biomechanical analysis using the finite element method. Validation was performed by comparing simulation results with dynamic MR imaging observations. Weaknesses of anatomical support structures were simulated by reducing their material stiffness. Urethral mobility was quantified by examining urethral axis excursion from rest to the final state (intra-abdominal pressure = 100 cmH2O). Seven individual support structures and five of their combinations were studied.
Among seven urethral support structures, we found that weakening the vaginal walls, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle generated the top three largest urethral excursion angles. A linear relationship was found between urethral axis excursions and intra-abdominal pressure. Weakening all three levator ani components together caused a larger weakening effect than the sum of each individually weakened component, indicating a nonlinearly additive pattern. The pelvic floor responded to different weakening conditions distinctly: weakening the vaginal wall developed urethral mobility through the collapsed vaginal canal, while weakening the levator ani showed a more uniform pelvic floor deformation.
The computational modeling and dynamic biomechanical analysis provides a powerful tool to better understand the dynamics of the female pelvis under pressure events. The vaginal walls, puborectalis, and pubococcygeus are the most important individual structures in providing urethral support. The levator ani muscle group provides urethral support in a well-coordinated way with a nonlinearly additive pattern.
KeywordsStress urinary incontinence Magnetic resonance imaging Pelvic muscle Urethral hypermobility Finite element method
This work was supported in part by NIH 4R00DK082644, NIH K99DK082644 and the University of Houston. The authors thank Dr. John O. DeLancey from the University of Michigan for his valuable consultation and Mr. Thomas Potter for editing the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
- 3.Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, Rahn DD, Thomas JV, Weidner AC, Nager CW (2010) Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(5):488. e481–488. e486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Del Vescovo R, Piccolo CL, Della Vecchia N, Giurazza F, Cazzato RL, Grasso RF, Zobel BB (2014) MRI role in morphological and functional assessment of the levator ani muscle: use in patients affected by stress urinary incontinence (SUI) before and after pelvic floor rehabilitation. Eur J Radiol 83(3):479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ren S, Xie B, Wang J, Rong Q (2015) Three-dimensional modeling of the pelvic floor support systems of subjects with and without pelvic organ prolapse. BioMed Res Int 2015Google Scholar
- 15.Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T, Parekh M, Tamussino K, Tosson S, Lose G (2008) Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J 19(1):5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Zhou D, Peng Y, Bai J, Rosandich RG (2014) Contact effect evaluation using stress distribution in viscoelastic material under generalized loading. Int J Model Simul 34 (4)Google Scholar
- 20.Brandt FT, Lorenzato FR, Nobrega LV, Albuquerque CD, Falcao R, Araujo Junior AA (2006) Intra-abdominal pressure measurement during ultrasound assessment of women with stress urinary incontinence: a novel model. Acta Cir Bras Soc Bras Desenvolvimento Pesqui Cir 21(4):237–241Google Scholar
- 21.Alafraa T, Schick E (2008) Relation between Intra-abdominal pressure variation and urethral hypermobility: the urethral mobility index. Poster Abstract at International Continence SocietyGoogle Scholar
- 26.Brandão FSQdS, Parente MPL, Rocha PAGG, Saraiva MTdQeCdM, Ramos IMAP, Natal Jorge RM (2015) Modeling the contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 1–10. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1028031
- 27.Peng Y, He J, Khavari R, Boone T, Zhang Y (2015) PD24-03 identification of innervation zones of the pelvic floor muscle from noninvasive high-density intra-vaginal/rectal surface EMG recordings. J Urol 4(193):e491Google Scholar
- 29.Yang L, Yong N, Jinbao H, Sheng L, Ping Z, Yingchun Z (2014) Internal muscle activity imaging from multi-channel surface EMG recordings: a validation study. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 26–30 Aug. 2014, pp 3559–3561. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944391