Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 1115–1121 | Cite as

Clustering of pelvic floor disorders 20 years after one vaginal or one cesarean birth

  • Maria GyhagenEmail author
  • Sigvard Åkervall
  • Ian Milsom
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess the prevalence and risk factors for co-occurring pelvic floor disorders (PFDs): urinary incontinence (UI), symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP), and fecal incontinence (FI), 20 years after one vaginal (VD) or one cesarean (CS) delivery.

Methods

We carried out a registry-based national cohort study of primiparae who delivered during the period 1985–1988 and had no further deliveries. Medical Birth Registry data were linked to data from postal questionnaires distributed 20 years post-partum (response rate 65.2 %, n = 5,236). Main outcome measures were prevalence and risk factors for combined and isolated PFDs.

Results

The prevalence of any PFD was 46.5; 31.7 % had one symptom and 14.8 % had two or more. Co-occurring symptoms doubled after VD (17.1 %) compared with CS (8.4 %) (adjOR 2.26; 95 % CI 1.84–2.79). The strongest association was observed between VD and having all three symptoms (adjOR 5.20; 95 % CI 2.73–9.91), followed by the combination of sPOP and UI (adjOR 3.38; 95 % CI 2.24–5.10). The degree of frustration perceived by the women because of pelvic floor dysfunction increased with each additional co-occurring PFD (p < 0.001). The strongest risk factors for clustering of PFDs were: VD (OR 2.19; 95 % CI 1.75–2.73), family history (OR 2.03; 95 % CI 1.73–2.34), and ≥2 degree tear (OR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.24–2.55). Vacuum extraction and episiotomy were not risk factors.

Conclusions

The prevalence of co-occurring PFDs was high and was doubled in women after VD compared with CS. Women with UI most likely had it as an isolated symptom, whereas FI and sPOP more often occurred in combination.

Keywords

Epidemiology Cesarean section Combinations Long-term Pelvic floor dysfunction Vaginal delivery 

Notes

Funding

The study was supported by a National LUA/ALF grant no. 11315 and the Region of Västra Götaland, grants from The Göteborg Medical Society and Hjalmar Svenssons Fund. The funding source played no role in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. MG and IM had full access to all study data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Authors’ contributions

M. Gyhagen, S. Åkervall, I. Milsom all contributed to protocol/project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing.

Conflict of interest

None.

Supplementary material

192_2015_2663_MOESM1_ESM.doc (144 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 143 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwright R, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U, Tikkanen K (2013) Epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal (AI) incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Health Publications, Paris, pp 15–107Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2010) Prevalence of double incontinence, risks and influence on quality of life in a general female population. Neurourol Urodyn 29:545–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Botlero R, Bell RJ, Urquhart DM, Davis SR (2011) Prevalence of faecal incontinence and its relationship with urinary incontinence in women living in the community. Menopause 18:685–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawrence JM, Lukacz ES, Nager CW, Hsu J-WY, Luber KM (2008) Prevalence and co-occurrence of pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women. Obstet Gynecol 111:678–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rortveit G, Subak LL, Thom DH et al (2010) Urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in a population-based, racially diverse cohort: prevalence and risk factors. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 16:278–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I (2013) The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 120:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, Hammarstrom M (2005) A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J Clin Epidemiol 58:41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu MJ, Vaughan CP, Goode PS et al (2014) Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol 123:141–148PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300:1311–1316PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Lieber MM, Talley NJ (1999) Prevalence of combined faecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:837–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uustal Fornell E, Wingren G, Kjølhede P (2003) Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence and symptoms of genital prolapse in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:280–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manning J, Eyers AA, Korda A, Benness C, Solomon MJ (2001) Is there association between faecal incontinence and lower urinary dysfunction? Dis Colon Rectum 44:790–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I (2013) The prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 120:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gudmundsson S, Henningsson A-C, Lindqvist P (2005) Correlation of birth injury with maternal height and birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynecol 112:764–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel DA, Xu X, Thomason AD, Ransom SB, Ivy JS, DeLancey JOL (2006) Childbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: An epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:23–28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Delft K, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Kluivers K (2014) The relationship between postpartum levator ani avulsion and signs and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Br J Obstet Gynecol 121:1164–1172Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dietz HP, Franco AVM, Sheck KL, Kirby A (2012) Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for prolapse? An observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91:211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jack GS, Nikolova G, Vilain E, Raz S, Rodríguez LV (2006) Familial transmission of genitovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:498–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLennan MT, Harris JK, Kariuki B, Meyer S (2008) Family history as a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 19:1063–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I (2014) Faecal incontinence 20 years after one birth - A comparison between vaginal delivery and caesarean section. Int Urogynecol J 25:1411–1418Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2009) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:184.e1−184.e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milsom I, Ekelund P, Molander O, Arvidsson L, Areskoug B (1993) The influence of age, parity, oral contraception, hysterectomy and menopaus on the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 149:1459–1462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thom DH, van den Eeden SK, Ragins AI, Wassel-Fyr C, Vittinghof E, Subak LL et al (2006) Difference in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. J Urol 175:259–264PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grodstein F, Frett R, Lifford K, Resnick N, Curhan G (2003) Association of age, race, and obstetric history with urinary symptoms among women in the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:428–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Diokno AC, Brown MB, Brock BM, Herzog AR, Normolle DP (1988) Clinical and cystometric characteristics of continent and incontinent noinstitutionalized elderly. J Urol 140:567–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herzog AR, Fultz NH (1990) Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community dwelling populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:273–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Tabirca SS, O’Reilly BA (2014) The role of prepregnancy pelvic floor dysfunction in postnatal pelvic morbidity in primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J 25(10):1363–1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wennberg A-L, Altman D, Lundholm C, Klint A, Iliadou A, Peeker R et al (2011) Genetic influences are important for most but not all lower urinary tract symptoms: a population-based survey in a cohort of adult Swedish twins. Eur Urol 59:1032–1038PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg UniversityGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödra Älvsborgs HospitalBoråsSweden
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySödra Älvsborgs HospitalBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations