Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 1083–1087 | Cite as

Laparoscopic reconstruction of an iatrogenic perforation of the neovagina and urinary bladder by a neovaginal dilator in a patient with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome

  • Wael Y. KhoderEmail author
  • Christian G. Stief
  • Maximiliane Burgmann
  • Alexander Burges
IUJ Video
  • 169 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome (MRKH) is a rare genital aplasia syndrome. Patients with MRKH regularly dilate their neovagina with vaginal dilatators.

Methods

A 23-year-old MRKH syndrome patient came to our department complaining of a lost vaginal dilator, which she had inserted 2 days previously. She had no bleeding or abdominal pain, but did have occasional urine loss. She had a history of abdominal exploration for an acute abdomen and the creation of a neovagina at the age of 16. An abdominal CT scan located the dislocated dilator intravesically. After diagnostic laparoscopy, the dilator was removed through the vesico-neovaginal perforation. The vagina was closed and covered by a pedicled peritoneal flap, followed by closure of the urinary bladder. An omental J-flap was then fixed between the vagina and bladder.

Results

The operative time was 185 min, with no significant blood loss, injuries or need for conversion/revision. The indwelling catheter was removed 7 days later after cystography, followed by normal micturition and an adequate bladder capacity. Vaginal dilation and sexual activity was resumed 1 month postoperatively. Follow-up was uneventful.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic vaginal dilator removal with immediate repair of the perforation of the neovagina and the urinary bladder directly after an acute trauma in a patient with MRKH syndrome may be a management option. It is a feasible, safe and viable operation in the hands of experienced laparoscopists.

Keywords

Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome Vesico-vaginal fistula Traumatic urinary bladder injuries 

Notes

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Conflicts of interest

We disclose any commercial association that might pose a conflict in connection with the submitted article.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 99518 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pavanello Rde C, Eigier A, Otto PA (1988) Relationship between Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster (MRK) anomaly and hereditary renal adysplasia (HRA). Am J Med Genet 29:845–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simpson JL (1999) Genetics of the female reproductive ducts. Am J Med Genet 89:224–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morcel K, Camborieux L, Guerrier D (2007) Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:13PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McQuillan SK, Grover SR (2014) Dilation and surgical management in vaginal agenesis: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 25:299–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Angioli R, Penalver M, Muzii L, Mendez L, Mirhashemi R, Bellati F, Crocè C, Panici PB (2003) Guidelines of how to manage vesicovaginal fistula. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:295–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sotelo R, Moros V, Clavijo R, Poulakis V (2012) Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF). BJU Int 109:1416–1434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miklos JR, Soboluwski C, Lucente V (1999) Laparoscopic management of recurrent vesicovaginal fistula. Int Urogynaecol J 10:116–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michala L, Cutner A, Creighton SM (2007) Surgical approaches to treating vaginal agenesis. Br J Obstet Gynecol 114:1455–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miyahara Y, Yoshida S, Shirakawa T et al (2013) Less invasive new vaginoplasty using laparoscopy, atelocollagen sponge, and hand-made mould. Kobe J Med Sci 58:138–144Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carr LK, Webster GD (1996) Abdominal repair of vesicovaginal fistula. Urology 48:10–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Fontana E, Restelli E, Bruni V (2008) The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(377):1–6Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romics I, Kelemen Z, Fazakas Z (2002) The diagnosis and management of vesicovaginal fistulae. BJU Int 89:764–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sotelo R, Mariano MB, Garcia-Segui A et al (2005) Laparoscopic repair of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 173:1615–1618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hemal AK, Kolla SB, Wadhwa P (2008) Robotic reconstruction for recurrent supratrigonal vesicovaginal fistulas. J Urol 180:981–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grody MHT, Nyirjesy P, Chatwani A (1999) Intravesical foreign body and vesicovaginal fistula: a rare complication of a neglected pessary. Int Urogynecol J 10:407–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Penrose KJ, Ma Yin J, Tsokos N (2013) Delayed vesicovaginal fistula after ring pessary usage. Int Urogynecol J 25:291–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arias BE, Ridgeway B, Barber MD (2008) Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1173–1178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Staskin D, Malloy T, Carpiniello V et al (1985) Urological complications secondary to a contraceptive diaphragm. J Urol 134:142–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yong PJ, Garrey MM, Geoffrion R (2011) Transvaginal repair and graft interposition for rectovaginal fistula due to a neglected pessary: case report and review of the literature. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:195–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wael Y. Khoder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian G. Stief
    • 1
  • Maximiliane Burgmann
    • 2
  • Alexander Burges
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Department for Gynecology and ObstetricsLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations