We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Advertisement

Döderlein–Krönig vaginal hysterectomy: an alternative to the traditional Heaney hysterectomy

  • 469 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the surgical steps of performing the Döderlein–Krönig hysterectomy.

Method

A video recording was made of the hysterectomy using an alternative technique described by Drs. Döderlein and Krönig in 1906. The patient in the video had stage 3 prolapse and desired surgical correction. The video demonstrates an exam under anesthesia, an anterior colpotomy, delivery of the uterine fundus through the colpotomy, and completion of the hysterectomy. The surgery was performed by a urogynecologist and a resident physician. The patient tolerated the procedure well and had no symptom recurrence at her 1-year follow-up visit. This video was presented at the 2014 International Urogynecological Association Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, as a nondiscussed video poster.

Conclusions

This video can assist and educate others in using this technique for performing a hysterectomy. Possible benefits of this approach include decreased blood loss and improved visualization, especially in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. 1.

    Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A (2009) Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 114(5):1041–8

  2. 2.

    Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110(5):1091–5

  3. 3.

    ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444 (2009) Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 114(5):1156–8

  4. 4.

    Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R et al (2009) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(3):CD003677

  5. 5.

    Döderlein A, Krönig S (1906) Die technik der vaginalen Bauchhöhlenoperationen. Verlag Von S Hirzel, Leipzig

  6. 6.

    Graves WF (1916) Gynecology. W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia

  7. 7.

    Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW (2012) Advances in Reconstructive Vaginal Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 179

  8. 8.

    Russell SC, Hibbert ML, Davis G (2001) Döderlein hysterectomy an alternative approach to the traditional vaginal hysterectomy. J Pelvic Surg 7(5):266–271

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Correspondence to Daniel E. Stone.

Additional information

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MP4 99158 kb)

ESM 1

(MP4 99158 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stone, D.E., Malik, S.A., Doerhman, P. et al. Döderlein–Krönig vaginal hysterectomy: an alternative to the traditional Heaney hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J 26, 769–771 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2598-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Prolapse
  • Hysterectomy
  • Vaginal
  • Vaginal hysterectomy
  • Total vaginal
  • Hysterectomy
  • Heaney
  • Doderlein
  • Doderlein–Kronig