Diagnosing levator avulsions after first delivery by tomographic ultrasound: reliability between observers from different centers
- 257 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
To evaluate the interobserver reliability of diagnosing levator avulsions between observers from different centers using tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) in women after their first delivery.
Transperineal ultrasound volume datasets of 40 women 6 months after their first delivery were analyzed by five observers from four different centers. Levator avulsions were diagnosed using TUI and datasets were assessed as optimal or suboptimal image quality and optimal or suboptimal pelvic floor contraction. Cohen’s kappa was used to evaluate the interobserver reliability of diagnosing levator avulsions for the total group, the group with optimal and suboptimal image quality, and the group with optimal and suboptimal pelvic floor contraction. Consensus on the presence or absence of avulsions was scored according to the number of observers who diagnosed an avulsion (0 = consensus on the absence of avulsion, 1–4 = avulsion diagnosed by 1 to 4 observers, 5 = consensus on the presence of avulsion).
For the total group, the interobserver reliability varied widely, with kappa values ranging from −0.07 to 0.72. Analyzes in the subgroups showed comparable results. Of the women who potentially have an avulsion (avulsion diagnosed by at least one observer), consensus on the presence of an avulsion was reached in 0.0 to 20.0 %. Of the women who potentially have no avulsion (no avulsion diagnosed by at least one observer), consensus on the absence of an avulsion was reached in 46.7 to 85.7 %.
Diagnosing levator avulsions using TUI in women 6 months after their first delivery is strongly observer-dependent and therefore not generalizable.
KeywordsInterobserver reliability Levator avulsion Pelvic floor Postpartum Tomographic ultrasound imaging Transperineal ultrasound
Conflicts of interest
- 9.Zhuang RR, Song YF, Chen ZQ, Ma M, Huang HJ, Chen JH, Li YM (2011) Levator avulsion using a tomographic ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:232.e1–232.e8Google Scholar
- 13.Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, Lavy Y, Cohen SM, Yagel S (2009) Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:91.e1–91.e7Google Scholar
- 17.Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3:291–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:586.e1–586.e6Google Scholar