Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 1501–1506 | Cite as

Diagnosing levator avulsions after first delivery by tomographic ultrasound: reliability between observers from different centers

  • G. A. van VeelenEmail author
  • K. J. Schweitzer
  • K. van Delft
  • K. B. Kluivers
  • M. Weemhoff
  • C. H. van der Vaart
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To evaluate the interobserver reliability of diagnosing levator avulsions between observers from different centers using tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) in women after their first delivery.

Methods

Transperineal ultrasound volume datasets of 40 women 6 months after their first delivery were analyzed by five observers from four different centers. Levator avulsions were diagnosed using TUI and datasets were assessed as optimal or suboptimal image quality and optimal or suboptimal pelvic floor contraction. Cohen’s kappa was used to evaluate the interobserver reliability of diagnosing levator avulsions for the total group, the group with optimal and suboptimal image quality, and the group with optimal and suboptimal pelvic floor contraction. Consensus on the presence or absence of avulsions was scored according to the number of observers who diagnosed an avulsion (0 = consensus on the absence of avulsion, 1–4 = avulsion diagnosed by 1 to 4 observers, 5 = consensus on the presence of avulsion).

Results

For the total group, the interobserver reliability varied widely, with kappa values ranging from −0.07 to 0.72. Analyzes in the subgroups showed comparable results. Of the women who potentially have an avulsion (avulsion diagnosed by at least one observer), consensus on the presence of an avulsion was reached in 0.0 to 20.0 %. Of the women who potentially have no avulsion (no avulsion diagnosed by at least one observer), consensus on the absence of an avulsion was reached in 46.7 to 85.7 %.

Conclusions

Diagnosing levator avulsions using TUI in women 6 months after their first delivery is strongly observer-dependent and therefore not generalizable.

Keywords

Interobserver reliability Levator avulsion Pelvic floor Postpartum Tomographic ultrasound imaging Transperineal ultrasound 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding

None.

References

  1. 1.
    DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S (2003) The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 101:46–53PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dietz HP, Lanzarone V (2005) Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:707–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Hussain H, Umek W, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109:295–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2006) The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG 113:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dietz HP, Simpson JM (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115:979–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weemhoff M, Vergeldt TF, Notten K, Serroyen J, Kampschoer PH, Roumen FJ (2012) Avulsion of puborectalis muscle and other risk factors for cystocele recurrence: a 2-year follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 23:65–71PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietz HP, Chantarasorn V, Shek KL (2010) Levator avulsion is a risk factor for cystocele recurrence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz HP, Shek KL (2009) Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: which levels matter most? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:698–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhuang RR, Song YF, Chen ZQ, Ma M, Huang HJ, Chen JH, Li YM (2011) Levator avulsion using a tomographic ultrasound and magnetic resonance-based model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:232.e1–232.e8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kruger JA, Dietz HP, Budgett SC, Dumoulin CL (2013) Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds? Neurourol Urodyn. doi: 10.1002/nau.22386 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volloyhaug I, Wong V, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2013) Does levator avulsion cause distension of the genital hiatus and perineal body? Int Urogynecol J 24:1161–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG 117:1485–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valsky DV, Lipschuetz M, Bord A, Eldar I, Messing B, Hochner-Celnikier D, Lavy Y, Cohen SM, Yagel S (2009) Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:91.e1–91.e7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albrich SB, Laterza RM, Skala C, Salvatore S, Koelbl H, Naumann G (2012) Impact of mode of delivery on levator morphology: a prospective observational study with three-dimensional ultrasound early in the postpartum period. BJOG 119:51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, Braekken IH, Bo K, Engh ME (2013) Pelvic floor muscle injuries 6 weeks post partum—an intra- and inter-rater study. Neurourol Urodyn 32:993–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Veelen GA, Schweitzer KJ, van der Vaart CH (2013) Reliability of pelvic floor measurements on three- and four-dimensional ultrasound during and after first pregnancy: implications for training. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42:590–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3:291–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP (2003) Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 22:97–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dietz HP (2007) Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:329–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A, Shek KL (2011) Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 22:699–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dietz HP (2004) Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. II. Three-dimensional or volume imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:615–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Delft K, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2013) Inter-rater reliability of assessment of levator ani muscle strength and attachment to the pubic bone in nulliparous women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42:341–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB (1993) Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 46:423–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Adisuroso T, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor in nulliparous pregnant women: limits of normality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:698–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shek KL, Dietz HP (2010) Can levator avulsion be predicted antenatally? Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:586.e1–586.e6Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cassadó J, Pessarrodona A, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Hinojosa L, Manrique G, Márguez A, Macias M (2013) Does episiotomy protect against injury of the levator ani muscle in normal vaginal delivery? Neurourol Urodyn. doi: 10.1002/nau.22488 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S, Dietz HP (2012) Does levator trauma ‘heal’? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40:570–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. van Veelen
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. J. Schweitzer
    • 1
  • K. van Delft
    • 2
  • K. B. Kluivers
    • 3
  • M. Weemhoff
    • 4
  • C. H. van der Vaart
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Reproductive Medicine and GynecologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyCroydon University HospitalCroydonUK
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations