International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 1463–1470 | Cite as

Prevalence, etiology and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in premenopausal primiparous women

  • C. M. DurneaEmail author
  • A. S. Khashan
  • L. C. Kenny
  • U. A. Durnea
  • M. M. Smyth
  • B. A. O’Reilly
Original Article



The natural history of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is poorly understood. We investigated the prevalence and risk factors of postnatal POP in premenopausal primiparous women and the associated effect of mode of delivery.


We conducted a prospective cohort study in a tertiary teaching hospital attending 9,000 deliveries annually. Collagen-diseases history and clinical assessment was performed in 202 primiparae at ≥1 year postnatally. Assessment included Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, Beighton mobility score, 2/3D-transperineal ultrasound (US) and quantification of collagen type III levels. Association with POP was assessed using various statistical tests, including logistic regression, where results with p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.


POP had a high prevalence: uterine prolapse 89 %, cystocele 90 %, rectocele 70 % and up to 65 % having grade two on POP-Q staging. The majority had multicompartment involvement, and 80 % were asymptomatic. POP was significantly associated with joint hypermobility, vertebral hernia, varicose veins, asthma and high collagen type III levels (p < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression, only levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion was significant in selected cases (p < 0.05). Caesarean section (CS) was significantly protective against cystocele and rectocele but not for uterine prolapse.


Mild to moderate POP has a very high prevalence in premenopausal primiparous women. There is a significant association between POP, collagen levels, history of collagen disease and childbirth-related pelvic floor trauma. These findings support a congenital contribution to POP etiology, especially for uterine prolapse; however, pelvic trauma seems to play paramount role. CS is significantly protective against some types of prolapse only.


Pelvic organ prolapse Primiparous Cystocele Rectocele Collagen 



We thank all SCOPE Ireland participants, Continence Foundation Ireland and Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) for their input into this research project.


SCOPE Ireland is funded by Health Research Board of Ireland (grant reference CSA 2007/2). The study was supported by Continence Foundation Ireland and INFANT Centre, UCC.

This work was funded in part by Science Foundation Ireland.

Conflicts of interest


Supplementary material

192_2014_2382_MOESM1_ESM.bmp (1.6 mb)
Online Appendix A1 STARD flowchart indicating recruited numbers (BMP 1594 kb)
192_2014_2382_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Online Appendix A2 Medical conditions potentially associated with collagen disorders (DOCX 12 kb)
192_2014_2382_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (101 kb)
Online Appendix 3 A POP-Q assessment and ultrasound estimate of POP-Q coordinates (XLSX 100 kb)


  1. 1.
    Elenskaia K et al (2013) Effect of childbirth on pelvic organ support and quality of life: a longitudinal cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 24(6):927–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sze EH, Hobbs G (2011) A prospective cohort study of pelvic support changes among nulliparous, multiparous, and pre- and post-menopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 160:232–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jackson SR et al (1996) Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse. Lancet 347(9016):1658–1661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ewies AA, Al-Azzawi F, Thompson J (2003) Changes in extracellular matrix proteins in the cardinal ligaments of post-menopausal women with or without prolapse: a computerized immunohistomorphometric analysis. Hum Reprod 18(10):2189–2195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norton PA et al (1995) Genitourinary prolapse and joint hypermobility in women. Obstet Gynecol 85(2):225–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lammers K et al (2012) Pelvic organ prolapse and collagen-associated disorders. Int Urogynecol J 23(3):313–319PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchsbaum GM, Duecy EE (2008) Incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in parous/nulliparous pairs of identical twins. Neurourol Urodyn 27(6):496–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Twiss C, Triaca V, Rodriguez LV (2007) Familial transmission of urogenital prolapse and incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(5):464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz HP, Simpson JM (2008) Levator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115(8):979–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, Tabirca SS, O’Reilly BA (2013) An insight into pelvic floor status in nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J 25:337–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baessler K et al (2009) Australian pelvic floor questionnaire: a validated interviewer-administered pelvic floor questionnaire for routine clinic and research. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(2):149–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC (2007) Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol 34(4):804–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dietz HP, Lekskulchai O (2007) Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(6):688–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2012) The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J 23(2):175–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dietz HP, Abbu A, Shek KL (2008) The levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(7):941–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zou GY (2004) A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 159(7):702–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz HP et al (2012) Avulsion injury and levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for prolapse? An observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91(2):211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swift S (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse: is it time to define it? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):425–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin HDA (2013) What is ‘significant’ pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 24(1 Supplement):S65–S66Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerkhof MH, Hendriks L, Brolmann HA (2009) Changes in connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse—a review of the current literature. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(4):461–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edwall L, Carlstrom K, Jonasson AF (2007) Endocrine status and markers of collagen synthesis and degradation in serum and urogenital tissue from women with and without stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26(3):410–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knuuti E et al (2011) Genitourinary prolapse and joint hypermobility are associated with altered type I and III collagen metabolism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(5):1081–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenquist C et al (1998) Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA. First application of monoclonal antibodies for measurement in serum of bone-related degradation products from C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen. Clin Chem 44(11):2281–2289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bailey AJ (2001) Molecular mechanisms of ageing in connective tissues. Mech Ageing Dev 122(7):735–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gabriel B et al (2005) Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):475–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strohbehn K, Jakary JA, Delancey JO (1997) Pelvic organ prolapse in young women. Obstet Gynecol 90(1):33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724, discussion 1724–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nichols DH, Randall CR (1989) Vaginal surgery. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knuutinen A et al (2002) Smoking affects collagen synthesis and extracellular matrix turnover in human skin. Br J Dermatol 146(4):588–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thom DH et al (2006) Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. J Urol 175(1):259–264PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Durnea
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • A. S. Khashan
    • 1
  • L. C. Kenny
    • 1
  • U. A. Durnea
    • 1
  • M. M. Smyth
    • 3
  • B. A. O’Reilly
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT) and Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Department of UrogynaecologyCork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH)CorkIreland
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  4. 4.INFANT Research Centre, Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyCork University Maternity HospitalCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations