Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 1449–1452 | Cite as

UR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction?

  • Don Wilson
  • James Dornan
  • Ian Milsom
  • Robert FreemanEmail author
Clinical Opinion

Abstract

Vaginal childbirth is probably the most important factor in the aetiology of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and results in the combination of some or all of the following conditions: urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Up until now, it has been difficult to counsel women antenatally regarding risk factors for subsequent PFD, as there has been little good-quality, long-term information available. We now have moderately robust epidemiological data at 12 and 20 years after delivery and objective pathophysiological data (pudendal nerve trauma and levator defects/avulsion). In this commentary, we propose a scoring system (UR-CHOICE) to predict the risk of future PFD based on several major risk factors (UI before pregnancy, ethnicity, age at birth of first child, body mass index, family history (mother and sister) of PFD and baby’s weight and maternal height (if <160 cm and baby >4 kg) that have been identified for subsequent PFD risk. This scoring system will help with counselling for women regarding PFD prevention.

Keywords

Pelvic floor dysfunction Urinary incontinence Faecal incontinence Pelvic organ prolapse Vaginal delivery Caesarean section Prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Professor Bob Freeman was partially funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West of England. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Professor Cathryn Glazener, Professor of Health Services Research, Health Services Research Unit University of Aberdeen and Jean Hay-Smith Associate Professor Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand for their comments and advice on the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

Professor Ian Milsom: Speaker fees at educational meetings sponsored by Astellas, Pfizer and SCA. Professor Bob Freeman: Speaker fees at educational meetings sponsored by Astellas and Pfizer

References

  1. 1.
    Milsom I, Altman D, Cartwright R, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillén U, Tikkanen K (2013) Epidemiology of Urinary Incontinence (UI) and other Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Anal (AI) Incontinence. In: Abrams, Cardozo, Kouhry and Wein (eds). Incontinence, 5th edn. Health Publications Ltd, Paris pp 15–107Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D (2000) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 107:1460–1470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D, Templeton A, van der Meulen J (2013) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 120:1516–1525. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12363 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson JK, Lindow SW, Duthie GS (2007) The prevalence of occult obstetric anal sphincter injury following childbirth – literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 20:547–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wesnes SL, Lose G (2013) Preventing urinary incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: a review. Int Urogynecol J 24:889–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacArthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Wilson D (2011) Exclusive caesarean delivery and subsequent urinary and faecal incontinence : a 12 year longitudinal study. BJOG 118:1000–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glazener C, Elders A, MacArthur C, Lancashire RJ, Herbison P, Hagen S, Dean N, Toozs-Hobson P, Richardson K, McDonald A, McPherson G, Wilson D (2013) Childbirth and prolapse: long-term associations with the symptoms and objective measurements of pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 120:161–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen T, Milsom I (2013) The prevalence of urinary incontinence 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 120:144–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03301.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I (2013) Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 120:152–160. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I (2013) A comparison of the long-term consequences of vaginal delivery versus caesarean section on the prevalence, severity and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence subtypes: a national cohort study in primiparous women. BJOG 120:1548–1555. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12367 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietz HP (2013) Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53:220–230. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leijonhufvud MD, Lundholm C, Cnattinguius S, Granach F, Andolf E, Altman D (2011) Risks of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:70e1–70e6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat Caesarean deliveries. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 107:1226–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hyde MJ, Mostyn A, Modi N, Kemp PR (2012) The health implications of birth by caesarean section. Biol Rev 87:229–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jelovsek JE, Piccorelli A, Barber MD, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Kattan MW (2013) Prediction models for postpartum urinary and fecal incontinence in primiparous women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19:110–118. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31828508f0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don Wilson
    • 1
  • James Dornan
    • 2
  • Ian Milsom
    • 3
  • Robert Freeman
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDunedin School of Medicine, University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Fetal MedicineQueens UniversityBelfastUK
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg UniversityGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyPlymouth Hospitals NHS TrustPlymouthUK
  5. 5.UrogynaecologyPlymouth University Peninsula Medical SchoolPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations