Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 1277–1278 | Cite as

Autologous transobturator midurethral sling placement: a novel outpatient procedure for female stress urinary incontinence

  • Brian J. Linder
  • Daniel S. ElliottEmail author
IUJ Video

Abstract

Introduction

We present a novel outpatient transobturator autologous rectus fascia midurethral sling procedure.

Methods

A 55-year old woman presented with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as documented by history, physical exam, and 24-h pad test. Conservative and surgical treatment options were discussed. The patient was interested only in outpatient surgical options, however, and was adamantly opposed to any mesh procedures due to concerns regarding complications. Therefore, following an in-depth discussion and informed consent, a transobturator, autologous sling procedure was performed. The vaginal dissection was performed in the standard fashion. A rectus fascial strip measuring 7 × 1 cm rectus fascia was harvested. A trocar was passed through each obturator foramen. Fascial stay sutures were retracted through the skin incisions. The sling was then appropriately tensioned and the stay sutures tied together.

Results

The patient had an uncomplicated perioperative course. She voided spontaneously with low postvoid residual. At follow-up, she had no urinary leakage.

Conclusions

The transobturator autologous midurethral sling procedure is technically feasible and, in the short term, effective. Longer follow-up and larger series are needed to validate this procedure, which, however, may become a suitable option for patients and surgeons concerned with potential mesh complications.

Keywords

Autologous Transobturator Urethral sling Stress incontinence 

Notes

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 80300 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Fultz NH, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Kinchen KS, Obenchain R, Bump RC (2003) Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1275–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coyne KS, Kvasz M, Ireland AM, Milsom I, Kopp ZS, Chapple CR (2012) Urinary incontinence and its relationship to mental health and health-related quality of life in men and women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Eur Urol 61(1):88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.049 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chughtai BI, Elterman DS, Vertosick E, Maschino A, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS (2013) Midurethral sling is the dominant procedure for female stress urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American Urologists. Urology 82(6):1267–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD (2003) Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome. J Urol 170(1):134–137. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000064442.45724.af, discussion 137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L (2009) Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, Lowder JL, Sirls LT, Lemack GE, Arisco AM, Xu Y, Kusek JW (2011) Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(5):498.e1–498.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations