Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 1137–1139 | Cite as

Robotically assisted laparoscopic repair of anterior vaginal wall and uterine prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: initial experience and video

  • Patrick DällenbachEmail author
  • Nikolaus Veit
IUJ Video

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy is a well-established approach to vaginal apex support and was the first technique used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with robotic assistance. However, dissection at the level of the promontory may be difficult, especially in obese patients, and associated with rare but potential serious morbidity such as life-threatening vascular injury. In an attempt to avoid this risk, we describe a new robotic approach for POP repair with lateral suspension.

Methods

From March 2012 through June 2013, ten patients with symptomatic anterior vaginal wall and uterine prolapse were operated by a single surgeon. The video presents the different steps of robotically assisted laparoscopic repair of POP by lateral suspension with mesh and uterine conservation using da Vinci S or Si system.

Results

POP repair was successfully completed in all ten patients without any perioperative or postoperative complication.

Conclusion

Robotically assisted laparoscopic repair of POP by lateral suspension with mesh is a novel and feasible technique with promising short-term results. It may have several theoretical advantages over sacral colpopexy/hysteropexy and may represent an alternative in cases of difficult dissection of the promontory.

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse Sacrocolpopexy Hysteropexy Robotic surgery da Vinci system Uterine prolapse 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 83183 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC (2012) Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology 79:532–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kapandji M (1967) Treatment of urogenital prolapse by colpo-isthmo-cystopexy with transverse strip and crossed, multiple layer, ligamento-peritoneal douglasorrhaphy. Ann Chir 21:321–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cornier E, Madelenat P (1994) The M. Kapandji hysteropexy: a laparoscopic technic and preliminary results. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 23:378–385Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubuisson JB, Eperon I, Jacob S, Dubuisson J, Wenger JM, Dallenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I (2011) Laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: a continuous series of 218 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39:127–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of GynecologyGeneva University HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecology, Urogynecology UnitGeneva University HospitalsGenève 14Switzerland

Personalised recommendations