International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 927–933 | Cite as

Prevalence of unreported bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and the impact on their quality of life

  • Leonardo Robson Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra
  • José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto
  • Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos
  • Sara Arcanjo Lino Karbage
  • Amene Cidrão Lima
  • Isabella Parente Ribeiro Frota
  • Adriana Bombonato de Oliveira Rocha
  • Sandra Rebouças Macedo
  • Cassia Fernandes Coelho
  • Marília Karla Nunes Costa
  • Geisele Cavalcante de Souza
  • Sthela Murad Regadas
  • Kathiane Lustosa Augusto
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Little information is available on the recurrent coexistence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary (UI) and/or anal (AI) incontinence and defecatory dysfunctions and the relationship between these disorders. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence, bother, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of unreported bowel symptoms in women presenting to a Brazilian tertiary urogynecology clinic.

Methods

The study was a cross-section survey of 172 patients with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Patients who reported any defecatory and/or continence disorders were included in the study group, and the others were included in the control group. Patients with UI were also compared with those with double incontinence (DI): AI and UI. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous nonparametric data.

Results

After the interview, 54.6 % (n = 94) of patients presented AI and/or defecatory disorders: 67.0 % constipation, 41.4 % AI, and 34.0 % fecal urgency. Women from the study group scored worse in the QoL questionnaires compared with women from the control group. Among women with UI, 23.21 % had associated AI. Women with DI scored worse in the QoL questionnaires.

Conclusion

Anal and urinary dysfunctions are usually associated and have a great impact on a woman’s QoL. An integrated approach across specialties should lead to improved patient care. Therefore, our study is relevant because it emphasizes the importance of urogynecologists routinely investigating such symptoms. To do so, standardized questionnaires should be included in the evaluation of all these patients.

Keywords

Urinary incontinence Uterine prolapse Constipation Anal incontinence Quality of life 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Lawrence JM, Lukacz ES, Nager CW et al (2008) Prevalence and occurrence of pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women. Obstet Gynecol 111:678–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toglia MR (2009) Toglia pathophysiology of anal incontinence, constipation, and defecatory dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 36:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grimes CL, Lukacz ES (2012) Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related? Int Urogynecol J 23:537–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD (2006) Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1455–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thibault F, Wagner L, Rouvellat P et al (2012) Prolapsus uro-génital: analyse de la sexualité préopératoire. Sexual function before surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Prog Urol 22:665–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haylen BT et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Spennacchio M et al (2010) Prospective clinical and functional results of combined rectal and urogynecologic surgery in complex pelvic floor disorders. Am J Surg 199:144–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins SA, O’Sullivan DM, Lasala CA (2012) Correlation of POP-Q posterior compartment measures with defecatory dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 23:743–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MFR et al (2005) Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:2105–2111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selcuk S, Cam C, Asoglu MR et al (2012) The effect of concealed concomitant anal incontinence symptoms in patients with urinary incontinence on their quality of life. Int Urogynecol J 23:1781–1784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Markland AD, Richter HE, Kenton KS et al (2009) Associated factors and the impact of fecal incontinence in women with urge urinary incontinence: from the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network’s Behavior Enhances Drug Reduction of Incontinence study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:424.e1–424.e8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saks EK, Harvie HS, Asfaw TS et al (2010) Clinical significance of obstructive defecatory symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynecol Obstet 111:237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, Roovers JPW et al (2012) Contribution of Primary Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Micturition and Defecation Symptoms. Obstet Gynecol Int 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/798035
  14. 14.
    Dua A, Radley S, Brown S et al (2012) The effect of posterior colporrhaphy on anorectal function. Int Urogynecol J 23:749–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Varma MG, Hart SL, Brown JS et al (2008) Obstructive defecation in middle-aged women. Dig Dis Sci 53:2702–2709PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS et al (2005) Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1637–1642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Portella PM, Feldner PC Jr, Conceição JC et al (2012) Prevalence of and quality of life related to anal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 160:228–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vasconcelos CTM, Vasconcelos Neto JÁ, Bezerra LRPS et al (2013) Disfunções do assoalho pélvico: perfil sóciodemográfico e clínico das usuárias de um ambulatório de Uroginecologia. Rev Eletrônica Gestão Saúde 4:1484–1498Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ciconelli RM et al (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39(3):143–150Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tamanini JTN et al (2004) Validação para o português do “International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form” (ICIQ-SF). Rev Saude Publica 38(3):438–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tamanini JTN et al (2003) Validação do “King’s Health Questionnaire” para o português em mulheres com incontinência urinária. Rev Saude Publica 37(2):203–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Santana GWRM. Validação para português do questionário sexual para incontinência urinária/prolapso de órgãos pélvico (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire- PISQ-12). São Paulo, 2010. Dissertação de Mestrado Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa- SPGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Talasz H, Kremser C, Kofler M, Kalchschmid E (2011) Phase-locked parallel movement of diaphragm and pelvic floor during breathing and coughing—a dynamic MRI investigation in healthy females. Int Urogynecol J 22:61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeiffer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soligo M, Salvatore S, Emmanuel AV et al (2006) Patterns of constipation in urogynecology: clinical importance and pathophysiologic insights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:50–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Walters MD (2005) Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:2105–2111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pereira RA, Duffey KJ, Sichieri R et al Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: an analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutrition, available on CJO2012. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004892
  29. 29.
    Hove MCPS, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Burger CW, Vierhout ME (2009) The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J 20:1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Averbeck MA, Madersbacher H (2011) Constipation and LUTS - How do they affect each other? Int Braz J Urol 37(1):16–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Robson Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra
    • 1
  • José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto
    • 2
  • Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos
    • 3
  • Sara Arcanjo Lino Karbage
    • 4
  • Amene Cidrão Lima
    • 2
  • Isabella Parente Ribeiro Frota
    • 5
  • Adriana Bombonato de Oliveira Rocha
    • 5
  • Sandra Rebouças Macedo
    • 6
  • Cassia Fernandes Coelho
    • 3
  • Marília Karla Nunes Costa
    • 7
  • Geisele Cavalcante de Souza
    • 7
  • Sthela Murad Regadas
    • 3
  • Kathiane Lustosa Augusto
    • 2
  1. 1.Hospital Geral César Cals (HGCC)FortalezaBrazil
  2. 2.Hospital Geral de Fortaleza (HGF)FortalezaBrazil
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)FortalezaBrazil
  4. 4.Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)FortalezaBrazil
  5. 5.Universidade de São Paulo (USP)FortalezaBrazil
  6. 6.Universidade Christus (Unichristus)FortalezaBrazil
  7. 7.Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia de FortalezaFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations