Prevalence of unreported bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and the impact on their quality of life
- 465 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
Little information is available on the recurrent coexistence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary (UI) and/or anal (AI) incontinence and defecatory dysfunctions and the relationship between these disorders. The purpose of this study is to report the prevalence, bother, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of unreported bowel symptoms in women presenting to a Brazilian tertiary urogynecology clinic.
The study was a cross-section survey of 172 patients with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Patients who reported any defecatory and/or continence disorders were included in the study group, and the others were included in the control group. Patients with UI were also compared with those with double incontinence (DI): AI and UI. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous nonparametric data.
After the interview, 54.6 % (n = 94) of patients presented AI and/or defecatory disorders: 67.0 % constipation, 41.4 % AI, and 34.0 % fecal urgency. Women from the study group scored worse in the QoL questionnaires compared with women from the control group. Among women with UI, 23.21 % had associated AI. Women with DI scored worse in the QoL questionnaires.
Anal and urinary dysfunctions are usually associated and have a great impact on a woman’s QoL. An integrated approach across specialties should lead to improved patient care. Therefore, our study is relevant because it emphasizes the importance of urogynecologists routinely investigating such symptoms. To do so, standardized questionnaires should be included in the evaluation of all these patients.
KeywordsUrinary incontinence Uterine prolapse Constipation Anal incontinence Quality of life
Conflicts of interest
- 11.Markland AD, Richter HE, Kenton KS et al (2009) Associated factors and the impact of fecal incontinence in women with urge urinary incontinence: from the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network’s Behavior Enhances Drug Reduction of Incontinence study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:424.e1–424.e8Google Scholar
- 13.Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, Roovers JPW et al (2012) Contribution of Primary Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Micturition and Defecation Symptoms. Obstet Gynecol Int 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/798035
- 18.Vasconcelos CTM, Vasconcelos Neto JÁ, Bezerra LRPS et al (2013) Disfunções do assoalho pélvico: perfil sóciodemográfico e clínico das usuárias de um ambulatório de Uroginecologia. Rev Eletrônica Gestão Saúde 4:1484–1498Google Scholar
- 19.Ciconelli RM et al (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39(3):143–150Google Scholar
- 22.Santana GWRM. Validação para português do questionário sexual para incontinência urinária/prolapso de órgãos pélvico (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire- PISQ-12). São Paulo, 2010. Dissertação de Mestrado Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa- SPGoogle Scholar
- 28.Pereira RA, Duffey KJ, Sichieri R et al Sources of excessive saturated fat, trans fat and sugar consumption in Brazil: an analysis of the first Brazilian nationwide individual dietary survey. Public Health Nutrition, available on CJO2012. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004892