A pilot randomised controlled trial of the pelvic toner device in female stress urinary incontinence
- 446 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
To determine the feasibility of using the pelvic toner device (PTD) in aiding pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)
Methods
Forty women, aged at least 18 years with symptoms of pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence were randomly assigned to standard PFMT (ST group), or to PFMT and additional PTD (PTD group). They were evaluated throughout a treatment period of 16 weeks, and followed up 6 months after the active treatment period, using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ), bladder diaries, and other subjective outcome measures for symptom improvement.
Results
Twenty-four women were randomised to ST and 28 to PTD. Twelve women did not complete therapy and analysis was performed on 19 randomised to ST and 21 randomised to PTD on a per protocol basis. The two groups showed statistically significant symptom improvement in ICIQ responses, both at 16 weeks and at 6 months. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding improvement in SUI (ST 52.6 %, PTD 52.4 %) at 16 weeks. At 6 months after the active treatment period, 60 % of women (50 %, 8 in the PTD group and 71.4 %, 10 in the ST group) were still doing pelvic floor exercises. The sample difference observed was not statistically significant. Some women reported that the device helped with confidence that the correct muscles were being contracted, and helped motivation to sustain PFMT.
Conclusions
This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of PTD for aiding PFMT. It is a safe and well-tolerated adjunct in PFMT, which increases patient choice.
Keywords
Intra-vaginal resistance device Pelvic floor exercises Pelvic floor muscle training Randomised controlled trial Stress urinary incontinence Urinary incontinenceNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the women who took part in the study.
Conflicts of interest
Funding was via an unrestricted grant from Solution Project Management, UK. The design, data collection, analysis and writing up were independently undertaken by the investigators, with no corporate input.
References
- 1.Milsom I (2009) Lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Curr Opin Urol 19:337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kegel AH (1948) Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 56:238–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J (2010) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub2
- 4.NICE (2006) Urinary incontinence: the management of urinary incontinence in women. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Clinical Guideline 40: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/word/CG40quickrefguide1006.pdf
- 5.Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJC, Herbison GP, Roovers JP, HeinemanMJ (2011) Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7):CD009252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252
- 6.Herbison GP, Dean N (2002) Weighted vaginal cones for urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002114
- 7.Ferguson KL, McKey PL, Bishop KR, Kloen P, Verheul JB, Dougherty MC (1990) Stress urinary incontinence: effect of pelvic muscle exercise. Obstet Gynecol 75:671–675PubMedGoogle Scholar