Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 1467–1471 | Cite as

Diagnosis of female urethral diverticulum using transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography

  • Yi Dai
  • Jia Wang
  • Hong Shen
  • Rui-Ning Zhao
  • Yong-Zhong LiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study investigated the value of transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography for the diagnosis of female urethral diverticulum (UD) by comparing results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound images and surgical findings.

Methods

A total of 14 female UD patients underwent preoperative transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography between July 2010 and June 2012. History and physical examination were initially assessed by the same urologist. Transvaginal contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging was performed and interpreted by the same ultrasonographer. Definite diagnosis was made by tracking the flow of the microbubbles into the cyst. Additionally, sagittal, cross-sectional, and dynamic images were obtained, and color Doppler ultrasound was applied in all cases. Data on the size, location, configuration, and opening of the UD was documented, and then compared with the surgical findings.

Results

The most common symptoms presenting in the UD patients included urinary incontinence (71.5 %), recurrent urinary tract infection (57.1 %), frequency (50 %), urgency (35.7 %), dysuria (35.7 %), and dyspareunia (21.4 %). On physical examination, 8 out of 14 patients (57.1 %) had a palpable anterior vaginal wall mass, while 6 out of 14 patients (42.9 %) had no palpable mass. Transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography revealed 17 diverticula orifices in total and correlated well with surgical findings regarding the size, location, configuration, and the opening of the UD.

Conclusions

In patients with chronic irritative bladder symptoms, but with no response to conventional treatment a high index of suspicion for UD should be maintained. Our study demonstrates that transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography is a useful tool for defining the size, location, configuration, and opening of the UD before surgery.

Keywords

Urethra Diverticulum Transvaginal Contrast agent Sonourethrography Contrast-enhanced sonourethrography 

Notes

Ethical approval

After obtaining written informed consent and the approval of ethics committee of the West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University (Chengdu, China), all cases were initially assessed by inquiry and palpation by the same physician, and then underwent transvaginal contrast-enhanced sonourethrography for further UD diagnosis or evaluation.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MPG 1885 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tsivian M, Tsivian A, Shreiber L et al (2009) Female urethral diverticulum: a pathological insight. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:957–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith NA (2011) Treatment approach to female urethral diverticulum. Rev Col Bras Cir 38:440–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Porten S, Kielb S (2008) Diagnosis of female diverticula using magnetic resonance imaging. Adv Urol 2008:213516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rufford J, Cardozo L (2004) Urethral diverticula: a diagnostic dilemma. BJU Int 94:1044–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siegel CL, Middleton WD, Teefey SA et al (1998) Sonography of the female urethra. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1269–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacoby K, Rowbotham RK (1999) Double balloon positive pressure urethrography is more sensitive test than voiding cystourethrography for diagnosing urethral diverticulum in women. J Urol 162:2066–2069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dwarkasing RS, Dinkelaar W, Hop WC et al (2011) MRI evaluation of urethral diverticula and differential diagnosis in symptomatic women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:676–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foster R, Amundsen CL, Webster GD (2007) The utility of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and surgical planning before transvaginal periurethral diverticulectomy in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:315–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ockrim JL, Allen DJ, Shan PJ et al (2009) A tertiary experience of urethral diverticulectomy: diagnosis, imaging and surgical outcomes. BJU Int 103:1550–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim B, Hricak H, Tanagho EA (1993) Diagnosis of urethral diverticula in women: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:809–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung DE, Purohit RS, Girshman J et al (2010) Urethral diverticula in women: discrepancies between magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings. J Urol 183:2265–2269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chou CP, Levenson RB, Elsayes KM et al (2008) Imaging of female urethral diverticulum: an update. Radiographics 28:1917–1930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blander DS, Rovner ES, Schnall MD et al (2001) Endoluminal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of urethral diverticula in women. Urology 57:660–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Dai
    • 1
  • Jia Wang
    • 1
  • Hong Shen
    • 1
  • Rui-Ning Zhao
    • 1
  • Yong-Zhong Li
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Urology, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Ultrasonography, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations