International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 1347–1354 | Cite as

Randomized controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback for urinary incontinence

  • Tomoe Hirakawa
  • Shigeyuki Suzuki
  • Kumiko Kato
  • Momokazu Gotoh
  • Yoko Yoshikawa
Original Article


Introduction and hypothesis

To compare the effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without biofeedback (BF), for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), focusing on condition-specific quality of life (QOL) outcomes.


Women with SUI were randomized to PFMT with BF (BF group, n = 23) or without BF (PFMT group, n = 23) for 12 weeks. As primary outcome measures, subjective symptoms and QOL were assessed by the King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). A voiding diary, 1-h pad test, and measurement of PFM strength were secondary outcome measures. Changes in the primary and secondary outcomes were assessed before and after 12 weeks’ exercise training.


Of the 9 domains of the KHQ, the scores of 5 significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and the scores of 7 significantly decreased in the BF group. All ICIQ-SF items and the total score significantly decreased in both groups after therapy. The number of incontinence episodes significantly decreased in the PFMT group, and tended to decrease in the BF group, but this was not significant (P = 0.054). The leakage volume in the 1-h pad test tended to decrease in both groups, but was not significant. Maximum vaginal squeeze pressure significantly increased in both groups. There were no significant inter-group differences in the changes in any of the parameters assessed.


The results indicate that PFMT is effective for treating SUI. There is no apparent add-on effect of BF training in short-term follow-up.


Biofeedback Exercise therapy Pelvic floor Quality of life Rehabilitation Urinary incontinence 



Part of this study was sponsored by Medical Taskforce Co., Ltd. We wish to thank the NPO Aichi Society for Excretion Care.

Conflicts of interest


Financial disclaimers



  1. 1.
    Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H et al (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J (2010) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005654Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berghmans LC, Frederiks CM, de Bie RA et al (1996) Efficacy of biofeedback, when included with pelvic floor muscle exercise treatment, for genuine stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 15:37–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glavind K, Nøhr SB, Walter S (1996) Biofeedback and physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone in the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:339–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pages IH, Jahr S, Schaufele MK, Conradi E (2001) Comparative analysis of biofeedback and physical therapy for treatment of urinary stress incontinence in women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:494–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aukee P, Immonen P, Penttinen J, Laippala P, Airaksinen O (2002) Increase in pelvic floor muscle activity after 12 weeks’ training: a randomized prospective pilot study. Urology 60:1020–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mørkved S, Bø K, Fjørtoft T (2002) Effect of adding biofeedback to pelvic floor muscle training to treat urodynamic stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 100:730–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aksac B, Aki S, Karan A, Yalcin O, Isikoglu M, Eskiyurt N (2003) Biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Investig 56:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmidt AP, Sanches PR, Silva DP Jr, Ramos JG, Nohama P (2009) A new pelvic muscle trainer for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herderschee R, Hay-Smith EJ, Herbison GP, Roovers JP, Heineman MJ (2011) Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD009252Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO (1998) A pelvic muscle precontraction can reduce cough-related urine loss in selected women with mild SUI. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:870–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okamura K, Nojiri Y, Osuga Y (2009) Reliability and validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire for lower urinary tract symptoms in both genders. BJU Int 103:1673–1678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gotoh M, Donovan J, Corcos J et al (2001) Scored ICIQ-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form) for symptoms and QOL assessment in patients with urinary incontinence. JNBS 12:227–231 [in Japanese]Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gotoh M, Homma Y, Funahashi Y, Matsukawa Y, Kato M (2009) Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence questionnaire-short form. Int J Urol 16:303–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen J (1988) The effect size. In: Cohen J (ed) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 77–83Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rett MT, Simoes JA, Herrmann V, Pinto CL, Marques AA, Morais SS (2007) Management of stress urinary incontinence with surface electromyography-assisted biofeedback in women of reproductive age. Phys Ther 87:136–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Homma Y, Yamaguchi O, Hayashi K, Neurogenic Bladder Society Committee (2006) Epidemiologic survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in Japan. Urology 68:560–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dumoulin C, Glazener C, Jenkinson D (2011) Determining the optimal pelvic floor muscle training regimen for women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 30:746–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prashar S, Simons A, Bryant C, Dowell C, Moore KH (2000) Attitudes to vaginal/urethral touching and device placement in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:4–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chehrehrazi M, Arab AM, Karimi N, Zargham M (2009) Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction in stress urinary incontinent women: comparison between transabdominal ultrasound and perineometry. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1491–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lose G, Rosenkilde P, Gammelgaard J, Schroeder T (1988) Pad-weighing test performed with standardized bladder volume. Urology 32:78–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomoe Hirakawa
    • 1
  • Shigeyuki Suzuki
    • 1
  • Kumiko Kato
    • 2
  • Momokazu Gotoh
    • 3
  • Yoko Yoshikawa
    • 4
  1. 1.Program in Physical and Occupational TherapyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Female UrologyJapanese Red Cross Nagoya First HospitalNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of UrologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Department of UrologyKomaki City HospitalKomakiJapan

Personalised recommendations