International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 907–912 | Cite as

Predictive factors that influence treatment outcomes of innovative single incision sling: comparing TVT-Secur to an established transobturator sling for female stress urinary incontinence

  • Eugene Hwang
  • Ju Hyun Shin
  • Jae Sung Lim
  • Ki Hak Song
  • Chong Koo Sul
  • Yong Gil Na
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aims to identify independent risk factors for treatment failure of tension-free vaginal tape TVT-Secur (TVT-S) compared to that of the well-established transobturator tape.

Materials and methods

Of a total of 175 consecutive patients with urodynamically confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) identified between July 2007 and March 2010, 89 patients underwent TVT-S, and 86 underwent TOT. Cure was defined using the Urogenital Distress Inventory as no urinary leakage during physical activity, coughing, or sneezing as reported by patients during a telephone survey. To identify predictors of treatment failure, multivariable logistic regression models were used, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using variables identified during univariate analysis.

Results

There were more patients with cystocele ≥ grade 2 in the TVT-S group (p = 0.031); otherwise the groups were well matched. After a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 12–44 months), the overall cure rate was 80.6%; it was 70.8% for those treated with TVT-S and 90.7% for those treated with TOT (p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, previous incontinence surgery (OR 27.1, p = 0.005) and a cystocele ≥ grade 2 (OR 3.0, p = 0.020) were independent risk factors influencing the outcome of TVT-S procedures. For the TOT procedures, detrusor overactivity was an independent risk factor in a multivariate model (OR 8.6, p = 0.033).

Conclusions

TVT-S could be performed for selected patients, but conventional TOT procedures are still superior to the novel TVT-S device.

Keywords

Multivariate analysis Risk factors Suburethral sling Urinary stress incontinence 

Abbreviations

MUS

Midurethral sling

ORs

Odds ratios

SUI

Stress urinary incontinence

TOT

Transobturator tape

TVT

Tension-free vaginal tape

TVT-S

TVT-Secur

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this publication.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C, Touboul C, Parra J, Zerbib M et al (2007) Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol 51:782–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Gattei U, Bertozzi R (2007) Tension-free vaginal tape: analysis of risk factors for failure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:419–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowen LW, Sand PK, Ostergard DR, Franti CE (1989) Unsuccessful Burch retropubic urethropexy: a case controlled urodynamic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:452–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tartaglia E, Delicato G, Baffigo G, Signore S, Corvese F, Perla A et al (2009) Third-generation tension free tape for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 182:612–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martan A, Svabík K, Masata J, Koleska T, El-Haddad R, Pavlikova M (2009) Correlation between changes in ultrasound measurements and clinical curative effect of tension-free vaginal tape-SECUR procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliveira R, Silva A, Pinto R, Silva J, Silva C, Guimarães M et al (2009) Short-term assessment of a tension-free vaginal tape for treating female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 104:225–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornu JN, Sèbe P, Peyrat L, Ciofu C, Cussenot O, Haab F (2010) Midterm prospective evaluation of TVT-Secur reveals high failure rate. Eur Urol 58:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1048–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Media centre: obesity and overweight. Fact sheet No. 311, September 2006. World Health Organization Web site. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html
  12. 12.
    Lee KS, Lee YS, Seo JT, Na YG, Choo MS, Kim JC et al (2010) A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol 57:973–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group 3:291–306Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molden S, Patterson D, Tarr M, Sanses T, Bracken J, Nguyen A et al (2010) Risk factors leading to midurethral sling revision: a multicenter case–control study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:1253–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rezapour M, Ulmsten U (2001) Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence—a long-term follow up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(Suppl 2):S9–S11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Lee J (2010) Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brieger GM, Yip SK, Fung YM, Chung T (1996) Genital prolapse: a legacy of the West? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 36:52–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobashi K, Govier F (2005) The completely dry rate. A critical re -evaluation of outcomes with slings. Neurourol Urodynam 24:602–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sivaslioglu AA, Caliskan E, Dolen I, Haberal A (2007) A randomized comparison of transobturator tape and Burch colposuspension in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:1015–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tincello DG, Alfirevic Z (2002) Important clinical outcomes in urogynecology: views of patients, nurses and medical staff. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:96–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Hwang
    • 1
  • Ju Hyun Shin
    • 2
  • Jae Sung Lim
    • 2
  • Ki Hak Song
    • 2
  • Chong Koo Sul
    • 2
  • Yong Gil Na
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologySun General HospitalDaejeonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of UrologyChungnam National University School of MedicineDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations