International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 883–886 | Cite as

Subjective and objective results of anterior vaginal wall repair in an outpatient clinic: a 5-year follow-up

  • S. Greisen
  • M. Glavind-Kristensen
  • K. M. Bek
  • S. M. Axelsen
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This prospective follow-up study evaluates long-term subjective and objective outcome of conventional anterior vaginal wall repair in an outpatient setting.

Methods

Eighty-two women were operated. At 5-year follow-up anatomical results were evaluated by clinical examination. Furthermore, the women filled in a validated symptom and quality of life questionnaire.

Results

Seventy (85%) women attended the follow-up visit. Eleven percent of these had been reoperated for anterior vaginal wall prolapse and was considered a separate group in the analysis. Thirty-four percent had no pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Twenty-nine percent had stage 1 POP whereas 24% had stage 2 and 2% stage 3 at follow-up. Seventy-eight percent of the women had no bulge symptoms, and 73% of the women considered their condition improved.

Conclusions

At 5-year follow-up 78 % was relieved from their bulge symptoms by an operation using local anesthesia. Eleven percent of the women had been reoperated.

Keywords

Cystocele Vaginal wall prolapse Colporrhaphy Reoperation Local anesthesia Long-term follow-up 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J (2003) Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:372–7, discussion 377-9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS (2008) Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:437–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–304, discussion 1304-6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S (2007) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004014.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Axelsen SM, Bek KM (2004) Anterior vaginal wall repair using local anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:214–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L (2010) Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradley CS, Nygaard IE (2005) Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol 106:759–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z et al (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114:600–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R (2003) Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1261–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2010) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364:1826–1836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:235.e1–235.e8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jacquetin B, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, Clave H, Debodinance P, Hinoul P et al (2010) Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21(12):1455–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Greisen
    • 1
  • M. Glavind-Kristensen
    • 1
  • K. M. Bek
    • 1
  • S. M. Axelsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aarhus University Hospital, SkejbyAarhus NDenmark

Personalised recommendations