Accuracy of the digital anal examination in women with fecal incontinence
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
This study aims to determine the accuracy of digital rectal examination (DRE) to detect anal sphincter defects when compared to endoanal ultrasound (US) in women with fecal incontinence (FI).
Methods
Seventy-four patients identified by retrospective chart review who presented with complaints of bothersome FI who underwent endoanal US are the subjects of this analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for the ability of the DRE to detect anal sphincter defects.
Results
Anal sphincter defect was suspected on DRE in 75%. At endoanal US, external sphincter defects were noted in all three segments in 41% (complete defect) while partial defects were noted in 30%. DRE demonstrated a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 32%, +likelihood ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–1.16) and −likelihood ratio of 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2–1.24) for detecting a complete EAS defect on endoanal US.
Conclusion
DRE has poor specificity for detecting anal sphincter defects seen on endoanal US.
Keywords
Anal sphincter Anal sphincter defect Digital rectal examination Endoanal ultrasound Fecal incontinenceNotes
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Hannaway CD, Hull TL (2008) Fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 35(2):249–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL et al (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Madoff RD, Williams JG, Caushaj PF (1992) Fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 326(15):1002–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.FDA (2011) Medical devices: device approvals and clearances. Medtronic InterStim Therapy System-P080025. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm249208.htm. Accessed 18 July 2011
- 5.Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI (1993) Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 80(4):508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M et al (2007) Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(7):783–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81(3):463–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Romano G, Rotondano G, Esposito P, Pellecchia L, Novi A (1996) External anal sphincter defects: correlation between pre-operative anal endosonography and intraoperative findings. Br J Radiol 69(817):6–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar