The effect of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor muscle function
- 529 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor muscle function (PFMF) is unclear. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the effect of pregnancy and childbirth on PFMF.
Subjective (Oxford scale) and objective (perineometry) assessments of PFMF were performed at 20 and 36 weeks gestation and at 14 weeks and 12 months after delivery. The resting pressure (RP) and the maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were recorded.
Four hundred three women (182 nulliparous and 221 multiparous) were recruited. Two hundred ninety-four (73%) delivered vaginally and 92 (23%) by caesarean section. RP and MSP improved significantly (p < 0.01) during pregnancy. After childbirth, a significant decrease in PFMF was demonstrated, which recovered completely by 1 year in majority of women.
There appears to be a physiological increment in PFMF during pregnancy. The pelvic floor weakens temporarily after childbirth but contractility appears to recover by 1 year irrespective of the mode of delivery.
KeywordsPelvic floor muscle function Mode of delivery Childbirth Oxford score Perineometry Second stage
Conflicts of interest
- 12.de Oliveira C, Lopes MA, Carla Longo e Pereira L, Zugaib M (2007) Effects of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 62(4):439–446Google Scholar
- 15.Caroci Ade S, Riesco ML, Sousa Wda S et al (2010) Analysis of pelvic floor musculature function during pregnancy and postpartum: a cohort study: (a prospective cohort study to assess the PFMS by perineometry and digital vaginal palpation during pregnancy and following vaginal or caesarean childbirth). J Clin Nurs 19(17–18):2424–2433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Laycock J (1994) Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schuessler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S (eds) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. Springer, London, pp 42–47Google Scholar
- 21.Dixon JS, Gosling JA (1994) Histomorphology of the pelvic floor muscle. In: Schuessler B, Laycock J, Norton P, Stanton S (eds) Pelvic floor re-education: principles and practice. Springer, London, pp 28–33Google Scholar