An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery
Introduction and hypothesis
A terminology and standardized classification has yet to be developed for those complications arising directly from the insertion of synthetic (prostheses) and biological (grafts) materials in female pelvic floor surgery.
This report on the above terminology and classification combines the input of members of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS) and a Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology, assisted at intervals by many expert external referees. An extensive process of 11 rounds of internal and external review took place with exhaustive examination of each aspect of the terminology and classification. Decision-making was by collective opinion (consensus).
A terminology and classification of complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery has been developed, with the classification based on category (C), time (T) and site (S) classes and divisions, that should encompass all conceivable scenarios for describing insertion complications and healing abnormalities. The CTS code for each complication, involving three (or four) letters and three numerals, is likely to be very suitable for any surgical audit or registry, particularly one that is procedure-specific. Users of the classification have been assisted by case examples, colour charts and online aids (www.icsoffice.org/complication).
A consensus-based terminology and classification report for prosthess and grafts complications in female pelvic floor surgery has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and research.
KeywordsClassification Complication Prosthesis Mesh Graft Female pelvic floor surgery
- 1.Stedman’s Medical Dictionary (2006) Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- 2.Concise Oxford Dictionary (1995). Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 5.Aldridge AH (1942) Transplantation of fascia for relief of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 44:398Google Scholar
- 10.Rosch R, Junge K, Hölzl F et al (2004) How to construct a mesh. In: Schumpelick V, Nyhus LM (eds) Meshes: benefits and risks. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–184Google Scholar
- 14.Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN (2010). An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26 and Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20Google Scholar