The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse
- 356 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
The objective of this study is to determine the association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.
This was an observational study. The subjects with pelvic floor disorder symptoms underwent two exams: a POPQ exam and a simplified POPQ. To compare with the simplified POPQ, vaginal segments of the POPQ exam were defined using points Ba, Bp, C, and D. Primary outcome was the association between the overall ordinal stages from each exam.
One hundred forty-three subjects with mean age of 56 +/− 13 years. Twenty three subjects were status post-hysterectomy. The Kendall's tau-b statistic for overall stage was 0.80, for the anterior vaginal wall the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the posterior vaginal wall segment the Kendall's tau-b was 0.71, for the cervix the Kendall's tau-b was 0.88, for the posterior fornix/vaginal cuff the Kendall's tau-b was 0.85.
There is substantial association between the POPQ and a simplified version of the POPQ.
KeywordsSimplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system Standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system Inter-system association
- 4.Prien-Larsen J, Mouritsen L (2001) Pelvic organ prolapse: is ICS-grading without POP-Q measurement reliable? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(Suppl):45, abstractGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kendall MG (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81–93Google Scholar
- 9.Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467–1471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar