Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors
- 1.2k Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
Information on the prevalence, risk factors and social consequences of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) affecting women in 16 low-income and lower middle-income countries is reviewed.
Medline searches were performed for articles dealing with prevalence of PFD.
Thirty studies were identified. The mean prevalence for pelvic organ prolapse was 19.7% (range 3.4–56.4%), urinary incontinence (UI) was 28.7% (range 5.2–70.8%) and faecal incontinence (FI) was 6.9% (range 5.3–41.0%). Risk factors for PFD are similar to those in more affluent countries particularly increased age and parity, but additionally, PFD is associated with other factors including poor nutrition and heavy work. The social consequences of PFD conditions can be devastating.
Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary and faecal incontinence are significant problems in developing countries. Access to health care to manage these conditions is often limited, and women usually have to live with the consequences for the rest of their lives.
KeywordsPelvic organ prolapse Prevalence Risk factors Urinary and faecal incontinence
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Pelvic organ prolapse
Interview and examination
Conflicts of interest
- 7.World Bank Country Classification, http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,contentMDK:20420458~menuPK:64133156~pagePK:64133150~piPK:64133175~theSitePK:239419,00.html accessed 20 April 2010
- 9.Ministry of Health and Population, Nepal, New Era and Macro International Inc. (2007) Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2006. New Era and Macro International Inc., Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and PopulationGoogle Scholar
- 19.Song YF, Zhang WJ, Song J, Xu B (2005) Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in Fuzhou Chinese women. Chin Med J (Engl) 118:887–892Google Scholar
- 29.Mikou F, Abbassi O, Benjelloun A, Matar N, el Mansouri A (2001) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in Moroccan women. Report of 1, 000 cases. Ann Urol (Paris) 35:280–289Google Scholar
- 33.Keskes J, Khairi H, Ben Said A, Hidar M, Pigné A (1988) Stress urinary incontinence in women. Epidemiologic inquiry. Apropos of 500 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 17:453–460Google Scholar
- 35.Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A, Keshavarz H, Setoudeh-Maram SZ (1998) Prevalence of reproductive morbidity among women of the Qashaq'I tribe, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 4:312–318Google Scholar
- 38.National Statistics Office (NSO) [Philippines] and Macro International Inc. (MI) (1994) National Demographic Survey 1993. NSO and MI, Calverton, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- 44.Ravindran TK, Savitri R, Bhavani A (1999) Women's experiences of utero-vaginal prolapse: a qualitative study from Tamil Nadu, India. In: Berer M, Sundari TK (eds) Safe motherhood initiatives: critical issues. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 166–172Google Scholar
- 45.Zhu L, Bian XM, Long Y, Lang JH (2008) Role of different childbirth strategies on pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study. Chin Med J (Engl) 121:213–215Google Scholar
- 52.Bhatia MR, Yesudian CAK, Gorter A, Thankappan (2006) Demand side financing for reproductive and child health services in India. Econ Polit Wkly 41:279–284Google Scholar
- 56.Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E et al (2010) International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29:4–20PubMedGoogle Scholar