International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1095–1102 | Cite as

Parity is not associated with urgency with or without urinary incontinence

  • Annemarie G. Hirsch
  • Vatche A. Minassian
  • Anne Dilley
  • Jennifer Sartorius
  • Walter F. Stewart
Original Article


Introduction and hypothesis

Evidence varies on the relation between parity and urgency or urge incontinence (UUI). We used data from the General Longitudinal Overactive Bladder Evaluation to determine whether differences in case definitions could account for variation in findings.


We simulated case criteria to correspond to studies of urgency, UUI, and parity using data from 1,880 patients. Logistic models were run for each case-control scenario corresponding to previously used case definitions.


Parity was significantly associated with urgency (odds ratios (OR) 1.70; CI: 1.30-2.22) and UUI (odds ratios (OR) 1.87; CI: 1.34-2.60) only when the case criteria included individuals with stress incontinence (SUI). Parity was not associated with UUI when individuals with SUI were excluded or with urgency when individuals with incontinence were excluded.


Neither urgency nor UUI symptoms appear to be associated with parity among women 40 years of age and older. Previous associations appear to be explained by inclusion of individuals with SUI.


Parity Urgency Urinary incontinence 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Altman D, Ekstrom A, Gustafsson C, Lopez A, Falconer C, Zetterstrom J (2006) Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 108:873–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaliha C, Digesu A, Hutchings A, Soligo M, Khullar V (2004) Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 111:754–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handa VL, Harvey L, Fox HE, Kjerulff KH (2004) Parity and route of delivery: does cesarean delivery reduce bladder symptoms later in life? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:463–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Nager CW, Luber KM (2006) Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 107:1253–1260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S, Study NEPINCONT (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or Cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2005) Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:789–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg RP, Kwon C, Gandhi S, Atkuru LV, Sorensen M, Sand PK (2003) Urinary incontinence among mothers of multiples: the protective effect of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1447–1450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viktrup L (2002) The risk of lower urinary tract symptoms five years after the first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn 21:2–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parazzini F, Chiaffarino F, Lavezzari M, Giambanco V, VIVA Study G (2003) Risk factors for stress, urge or mixed urinary incontinence in Italy. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 110:927–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foldspang A, Mommsen S, Lam GW, Elving L (1992) Parity as a correlate of adult female urinary incontinence prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 46:595–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thom DH, van den Eeden SK, Brown JS (1997) Evaluation of parturition and other reproductive variables as risk factors for urinary incontinence in later life. Obstet Gynecol 90:983–989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snooks SJ, Setchell M, Swash M, Henry MM (1984) Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 2:546–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J (1996) Pudendal nerve recovery after a non-instrumented vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J 7:102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKinnie V, Swift SE, Wang W, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, Kahn M et al (2005) The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:512–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW (1990) Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:770–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brubaker L (2004) Urgency: the cornerstone symptom of overactive bladder [see comment]. Urology 64:12–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wein AJ, Rackley RR (2006) Overactive bladder: a better understanding of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management [see comment]. J Urol 175:S5–S10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moller LA, Lose G, Jorgensen T (2000) Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40 to 60 years of age. Obstet Gynecol 96:446–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang W, Song Y, He X, Huang H, Xu B, Song J (2006) Prevalence and risk factors of overactive bladder syndrome in Fuzhou Chinese women. Neurourol Urodyn 25:717–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stewart WF, Minassian VA, Hirsch AG, Kolodner K, Fitzgerald M, Burgio K, et al (2009) Predictors of variability in urinary incontinence and overactive bladder symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. doi:10.1002/nau.20753
  21. 21.
    Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R et al (2003) Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 20:327–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM (1990) Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol 45:M67–M74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S (2000) A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn 19:137–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Buckwalter JG, Burchette RJ, Nager CW, Luber KM (2005) Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey. Int Urogynecol J 16:272–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A (2003) Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:327–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCormick MC, Brooks-Gunn J (1999) Concurrent child health status and maternal recall of events in infancy. Pediatrics 104:1176–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annemarie G. Hirsch
    • 1
  • Vatche A. Minassian
    • 1
  • Anne Dilley
    • 2
  • Jennifer Sartorius
    • 1
  • Walter F. Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Geisinger Clinic, Center for Health ResearchDanvilleUSA
  2. 2.GlaxoSmithKlineKing of PrussiaUSA

Personalised recommendations