International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 1183–1189 | Cite as

Portuguese validation of the Urinary Incontinence-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument: I-QOL

  • Carolina Chaves Cunha Souza
  • Andrea Moura Rodrigues
  • Cristina Eustáquia Ferreira
  • Eliana Suelotto Machado Fonseca
  • Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin Jármy di Bella
  • Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
  • Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori
  • Rodrigo Aquino Castro
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our objective was to translate and validate a Portuguese version of the Urinary Incontinence-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument (I-QOL), a questionnaire that is widely used in clinical trials.

Methods

Fifty patients completed the same questionnaire twice at a 2-week interval. During the first visit, we conducted a face-to-face interview and collected demographic data. The King's Health Questionnaire was completed during the same visit for comparisons.

Results

The results showed that the Portuguese version of the I-QOL has very good psychometrics properties. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (0.93), reproducibility was calculated through the intraclass correlation coefficient (0.88), construct validity was determined by comparing the I-QOL scores and King's Health scores, and discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the total I-QOL scores with measures of gravity.

Conclusions

We conclude that the Portuguese version of the I-QOL is a very good tool for the evaluation quality-of-life in women with urinary incontinence in Portuguese-speaking countries.

Keywords

Urinary incontinence Quality-of-life Validation Questionnaire Psychometrics properties Incontinence-specific quality-of-life measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Dr. Donald L. Patrick, Ph.D., MSPH, Professor, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, for his assistance and collaborative work in the development of this study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sue R, Soroka D, Karahalios A, Glazener CMA, Hay-Smith EJC, Drutz HP (2006) Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Summers KH, Svihra J, Lionis C, Donald LP (2005) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: cross-cultural performance of 15 languages versions of the I-QOL. Qual Life Res 14:1901–1913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hampel C, Wienhold D, Benken N, Eggersmann C, Thuroff JW (2003) Prevalence and natural history of urinary incontinence in women. Urology 62(4 Suppl 1):16–23Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naughton MJ, Donovan J, Badia X, Corcos J, Gotoh M, Kelleher C et al (2004) Symptom severity and QOL scales for urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S114–S123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lose G, Fantl JA, Victor A, Walter S, Wells TL, Wyman JF et al (1998) Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 17:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM (1999) The I-QOL: a quality-of-life instrument specific to persons with urinary incontinence: user's manual and scoring diskette for united States version. Health Research Associates, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Marquis P, Andrejasich CM, Bueshing DP (1999) Cultural adaptation of a quality-of-life measure for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 36:427–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP (1999) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL). Urology 53:71–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fultz NH, Herzog AR (1991) Measuring urinary incontinence in surveys. Gerontologist 11:708–713Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonseca ESM, Camargo ALMC, Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Fonseca MCMF, Lima GRL et al (2005) Validação do Questionário de Qualidade de Vida (King's Health Questionnaire) em mulheres brasileiras com incontinência urinária. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 27(5):235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barber MD (2007) Questionnaires with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:461–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cronbach LF (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometricka 16:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Control Clin Trials 12:142s–158sPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tamanini JTN, Almeida FG, Girotti ME, Ricetto CLZ, Palma PC, Rios LAS (2008) The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1385–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geller EJ, Barbee ER, Wu JM, Loomis MJ et al (2007) Validation of telephone administration of 2 condition- specific quality-of-life questionnaires. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:632.e 1–632.e4Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leidy NK, Elixhauser A, Rentz AM, Beach R, Pellock J, Schachter S et al (1999) Telephone Validation of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 (QOLIE-89). Epilepsia 40(1):97–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Chaves Cunha Souza
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrea Moura Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Cristina Eustáquia Ferreira
    • 1
  • Eliana Suelotto Machado Fonseca
    • 1
  • Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin Jármy di Bella
    • 1
  • Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
    • 1
  • Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Aquino Castro
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Department of GynecologyFederal University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations