The development of an Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire for patients undergoing pelvic floor physiotherapy in the treatment of stress incontinence
- 189 Downloads
Introduction and hypothesis
The aim of this paper is to develop a motivation questionnaire regarding perseverance in pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) supervised by physiotherapists for stress urinary incontinence.
Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in women with stress urinary incontinence that revealed 15 common themes; 117 items were constructed and reviewed by continence advisors. Surviving items (n = 73) were administered to 210 women. Data were analysed for item properties, factor analysis was used to examine the questionnaire structure and tests of convergence/divergence used to check for sensitivity.
The Incontinence Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (ITMQ) comprises 18-items in five scales, assessing attitudes towards treatment (72.62% of explained variance; α = 0.87), reasons for not doing PFMT (55.73%; α = 0.74), living with incontinence (62.70% variance; α = 0.70), desire for treatment (65.37% variance; α = 0.74) and the effect of incontinence severity on PFMT (51.62% variance, α = 0.68). Scales were generally sensitive to known group differences.
This study represents the first effort to develop a motivation scale for PFMT. This validated Motivation Questionnaire is an instrument to test the impact of motivation upon cure, in PFMT.
KeywordsMotivation questionnaire Pelvic floor muscle training Treatment adherence Urinary incontinence
We thank Wendy Allen, Hayley Leek, Katrina Parkin (research nurses and continence advisors), Janette O’Toole (pelvic floor physiotherapist) and Emmanuel Karantanis and William Kutessa (Urogynaecologists), for assistance with questionnaire design. We thank Kerrie Burgess for her assistance with administration of questionnaires.
The printing of questionnaires was funded by the Pelvic Floor Trust Fund. Staff costs were obviated by our 4th year medical student who assisted with this study as part of an Independent Learning Project (ILP) module with the University of New South Wales.
Conflicts of interest
- 2.Hay-Smith EJC, Dumoulin C (2006) Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005654 Review.Google Scholar
- 3.Moore KH, O’Sullivan RJ, Simons A, Prashar S, Anderson P, Louey M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of nurse continence advisor therapy versus standard urogynaecology regime for conservative incontinence treatment: efficacy, costs and two year follow up. BJOG 110:649–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Laycock J (1994) Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schussler B, Laycock J, Norton P et al (eds) Pelvic Floor Reeducation. Springer, London, pp 42–48Google Scholar
- 18.Pedhazur E, Schmelkin L (1991) Measurement, Design and Analysis: An integrated approach. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 19.Streiner D, Norman G (2006) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, 3rd edn. OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 23.Bo K, Kvarstein B, Nyggard I (2005) Lower urinary tract symptoms and pelvic floor muscle exercise adherence after 15 years. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 105:999–1005Google Scholar
- 24.Karantanis E, Stanton S, Parsons M, Robinson D, Blackwell A, Cardozo L et al (2003) Women’s preferences for treatment for stress incontinence—physiotherapy or surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 22:522–523Google Scholar