Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 281–288 | Cite as

Stress urinary incontinence 3 years after pregnancy: correlation to mode of delivery and parity

  • Viviane HerrmannEmail author
  • Katia Scarpa
  • Paulo Cesar Rodrigues Palma
  • Cassio Zanettini Riccetto
Original Article

Abstract

The aim was to estimate the incidence of stress urinary incontinence 3 years after delivery and its correlation to mode of delivery and parity. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 120 women at the Antenatal Clinic at the State University of Campinas. There was a significant difference in the incidence of postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUI) among patients with SUI during pregnancy (p > 0.0001). Women that were asymptomatic during pregnancy and had vaginal delivery developed SUI 2.4 times more frequently than after c-section (19.2% and 8.0%, respectively). The incidence of SUI after delivery dropped significantly in the primiparous (p = 0.0073) and multiparous 2–3 (p < 0.0001), but not in the multiparous with four or more deliveries (66.7% to 60.0%) (p = 0.5637). A significant correlation has been observed between parity and SUI (p = 0.0299). Pregnancy possibly predisposes to SUI 3 years after delivery as well as parity. No significant correlation has been demonstrated between mode of delivery and SUI.

Keywords

Mode of delivery Parity Pregnancy Stress urinary incontinence 

Abbreviations

SUI

Stress urinary incontinence

LUTS

Low urinary tract symptoms

US

United States

ICS

International Continence Society

RR

Risk ratio

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Rortveit G, Dalveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guarisi T, Pinto-Neto M, Osis MJ, Pedro AO, Paiva LH, Faúndes A (2001) Incontinência urinária entre mulheres climatéricas brasileiras: inquérito domiciliar. Rev Saúde Pública 35:428–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática—SIDRA. Contagem Nacional da População, 2000Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyrén O, Hammarström M (2005) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J 16:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foldspang A, Hvidman L, Mommsen S, Nielsen JB (2004) Risk of postpartum urinary incontinence associates with pregnancy and mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:923–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fritel X, Fauconnier SP, Levet C, Bénfila JL (2004) Stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery: a retrospective cohort survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:941–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Viktrup L (2002) The risk of lower urinary tract symptoms five years after the first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn 21:2–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun MJ, Chen GD, Chang SY, Lin KC, Chen SY (2005) Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms during pregnancy in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 104:185–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scarpa KP, Herrmann V, Palma PCR, Riccetto CLZ, Morais SS (2006) Prevalence and correlates of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy: a survey at Unicamp Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Int Urogynecol J 17:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glazener CMA, Herbison GP, MacArthur C, Lancashire R, McGee MA, Grant AM et al (2006) New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113:208–217Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacArthur C, Glazener CMA, Wilson PD, Lancashire RJ, Herbison GP, Grant AM (2006) Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113:218–224Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van der Bom JG, Heintz APM, van der Vaart CH (2006) How does prevalence of urogenital symptoms change during pregnancy? Neurourol Urodyn 25:135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chin HY, Chen MC, Liu YH, Wang KH (2006) Pospartum urinary incontinence: a comparison of vaginal delivery, elective, and emergent cesarean section. Int Urogynecol J 17:631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schytt E, Lindmark G, Waldenström U (2004) Symptoms of stress incontinence 1 year after childbirth: prevalence and predictors in a national Swedish sample. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:928–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:154–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ (2005) Pelvic floor morbidity at 3 years after instrumental delivery and cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:789–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carroli B, Belizan J (2000) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD 000081Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clemons JL, Towers GD, McClure GB, O’Boyle Al (2005) Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1620–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:1676–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hvidman L, Folsdpang A, Mommsen S, Nielsen JB (2003) Postpartum urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:556–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacArthur C, Glazener CMA, Lancashire RJ, Herbison GP, Wilson PD, Grant AM (2005) Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112:1075–1082Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uma R, Libby G, Murphy DJ (2005) Obstetric management of a women’s first delivery and the implications for pelvic surgery in later life. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112:1043–1046Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davila GW (2001) Informed consent for obstetrics management: a urogynecologic perspective. Int Urogynecol J 12:289–291Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dietz HP, Schierlitz L (2004) Pelvic floor trauma in childbirth—myth or reality? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 45:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Urogynecological Association 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viviane Herrmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katia Scarpa
    • 1
  • Paulo Cesar Rodrigues Palma
    • 2
  • Cassio Zanettini Riccetto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyState University of CampinasCampinasSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of UrologyState University of CampinasSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations