International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 459–465 | Cite as

Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal delivery: comparison of lower urinary tract symptoms

  • Åsa Ekström
  • Daniel Altman
  • Ingela Wiklund
  • Christina Larsson
  • Ellika Andolf
Original Article

Abstract

We compared the prevalence and risk of lower urinary tract symptoms in healthy primiparous women in relation to vaginal birth or elective cesarean section 9 months after delivery. We performed a prospective controlled cohort study including 220 women delivered by elective cesarean section and 215 by vaginal birth. All subjects received an identical questionnaire on lower urinary tract symptoms in late pregnancy, at 3 and 9 months postpartum. Two hundred twenty subjects underwent elective cesarean section, and 215 subjects underwent vaginal delivery. After childbirth, the 3-month questionnaire was completed by 389/435 subjects (89%) and the 9-month questionnaire by 376/435 subjects (86%). In the vaginal delivery cohort, all lower urinary tract symptoms increased significantly at 9 months follow-up. When compared to cesarean section, the prevalence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after vaginal delivery was significantly increased both at 3 (p < 0.001) and 9 months (p = 0.001) follow-up. In a multivariable risk model, vaginal delivery was the only obstetrical predictor for SUI [relative risk (RR) 8.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–42] and for urinary urgency (RR 7.3 95% CI 1.7–32) at 9 months follow-up. A history of SUI before pregnancy (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.5–19) and at 3 months follow-up (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7–8.5) were independent predictors for SUI at 9 months follow-up. Vaginal delivery is associated with an increased risk for lower urinary tract symptoms 9 months after childbirth when compared to elective cesarean section.

Keywords

Cesarean Delivery Incontinence Prospective 

References

  1. 1.
    Kenton K, Mueller ER (2006) The Global burden of female pelvic floor disorders. BJU Int 98:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miner PB Jr (2004) Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S8–S13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Nager CW, Luber KM (2006) Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 107:1253–1260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H (2000) Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 96:440–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP (1996) Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:154–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schytt E, Lindmark G, Waldenstrom U (2004) Symptoms of stress incontinence 1 year after childbirth: prevalence and predictors in a national Swedish sample. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:928–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L (2006) Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:181–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M (2004) Effects of carrying a pregnancy and of method of delivery on urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 4:4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farrell SA, Allen VM, Baskett TF (2001) Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol 97:350–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glazener CM, Herbison GP, MacArthur C et al (2006) New postnatal urinary incontinence: obstetric and other risk factors in primiparae. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 113:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH (2007) The effect of vaginal and cesarean delivery on lower urinary tract symptoms: what makes the difference? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:133–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ et al (2004) Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:917–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKinnie V, Swift SE, Wang W et al (2005) The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:512–517 (discussion 517–518)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groutz A, Rimon E, Peled S et al (2004) Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn 23:2–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Altman D, Ekstrom A, Gustafsson C, Lopez A, Falconer C, Zetterstrom J (2006) Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 108:873–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fritel X, Ringa V, Varnoux N, Fauconnier A, Piault S, Breart G (2005) Mode of delivery and severe stress incontinence. a cross-sectional study among 2,625 perimenopausal women. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 112:1646–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rortveit G, Hunskaar S (2006) Urinary incontinence and age at the first and last delivery: the Norwegian HUNT/EPINCONT study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:433–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D (2000) The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 107:1460–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Viktrup L, Rortveit G, Lose G (2006) Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108:248–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uustal Fornell E, Wingren G, Kjolhede P (2004) Factors associated with pelvic floor dysfunction with emphasis on urinary and fecal incontinence and genital prolapse: an epidemiological study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:383–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN (1994) Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101:22–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED et al (2002) Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. JAMA 287:1822–1831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, Lopaz A, Altman D, Zetterström J (2004) Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 104:1397–1342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts CL, Tracy S, Peat B (2000) Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. BMJ 321(7254):137–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Le Ray C, Gaudu S, Teboul M, Cabrol D (2004) Management of labor and delivery in low risk nulliparous women: comparison between level 1 and level 3 maternities. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 53:30–36Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harvey MA (2003) Pelvic floor exercises during and after pregnancy: a systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 25:487–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mouritsen L, Schiotz HA (2000) Pro et contra pelvic floor exercises for female stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:1043–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Urogynecology Journal 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Åsa Ekström
    • 1
  • Daniel Altman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ingela Wiklund
    • 1
  • Christina Larsson
    • 1
  • Ellika Andolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical SciencesDanderyd Hospital, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations