International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 137–142 | Cite as

Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI

  • Yvonne Hsu
  • Luyun Chen
  • Aimee Summers
  • James A. Ashton-Miller
  • James O. L. DeLancey
Original Article

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the relationship between midsagittal vaginal wall geometric parameters and the degree of anterior vaginal prolapse. We have previously presented data indicating that about half of anterior wall descent can be explained by the degree of apical descent present (Summers et al., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194:1438–1443, 2006). This led us to examine whether other midsagittal vaginal geometric parameters are associated with anterior wall descent. Magnetic resonance (MR) scans of 145 women from the prior study were suitable for analysis after eight were excluded because of inadequate visibility of the anterior vaginal wall. Subjects had been selected from a study of pelvic organ prolapse that included women with and without prolapse. All patients underwent supine dynamic MR scans in the midsagittal plane. Anterior vaginal wall length, location of distal vaginal wall point, and the area under the midsagittal profile of the anterior vaginal wall were measured during maximal Valsalva. A linear regression model was used to examine how much of the variance in cystocele size could be explained by these vaginal parameters. When both apical descent and vaginal length were considered in the linear regression model, 77% (R 2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) of the variation in anterior wall descent was explained. Distal vaginal point and a measure anterior wall shape, the area under the profile of the anterior vaginal wall, added little to the model. Increasing vaginal length was positively correlated with greater degrees of anterior vaginal prolapse during maximal Valsalva (R 2 = 0.30, p < 0.01) determining 30% of the variation in anterior wall decent. Greater degrees of anterior vaginal prolapse are associated with a longer vaginal wall. Linear regression modeling suggests that 77% of anterior wall descent can be explained by apical descent and midsagittal anterior vaginal wall length.

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse Anterior prolapse Cystocele Apical descent Vaginal length Dynamic MRI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding from NIH grant NICHD R01 HD038665 as well as investigator support from 5K12RR017607-04 and the Office for Research on Women’s Health and NICHD SCOR on Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Women’s Health P50 HD044406. This information was presented at the American Urogynecology Society meeting in October 2006.

References

  1. 1.
    Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JOL (2006) The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1438–1443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6):1160–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA (2001) Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1299–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Hussain H, Umek W, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA (2007) Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 109:295–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeLancey JOL (2002) Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:93–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morgan DM, Iyengar J, DeLancey JO (2003) A technique to evaluate the thickness and density of nonvascular smooth muscle in the suburethral fibromuscular layer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(5):1183–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):56–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric properties of the posterior vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(6):1501–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen BH, Wen Y, Li H, Polan ML (2002) Collagen metabolism and turnover in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13(2):80–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moalli PA, Talarico LC, Sung VW, Klingensmith WL, Shand SH, Meyn LA, Watkins SC (2004) Impact of menopause on collagen subtypes in the arcus tendineous fasciae pelvis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(3):620–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norton P, Boyd C, Deak S (1992) Collagen synthesis in women with genital prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 11:300–301Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liapis A, Bakas P, Pafiti A, Hassiakos D, Frangos-Plemenos M, Creatsas G (2000) Changes in the quantity of collagen type I in women with genuine stress incontinence. Urol Res 28(5):323–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liapis A, Bakas P, Pafiti A, Frangos-Plemenos M, Arnoyannaki N, Creatsas G (2001) Changes of collagen type III in female patients with genuine stress incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 97(1):76–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kokcu A, Yanik F, Cetinkaya M, Alper T, Kandemir B, Malatyalioglu E (2002) Histopathological evaluation of the connective tissue of the vaginal fascia and the uterine ligaments in women with and without pelvic relaxation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(2):75–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hsu Y, Chen L, DeLancey JOL, Ashton-Miller JA (2005) Vaginal thickness, cross-sectional area, and perimeter in women with and those without prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 105(5):1012–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kondo A, Narushima M, Yoshikawa Y, Hayashi H (1994) Pelvic fascia strength in women with stress urinary incontinence in comparison with those who are continent. Neurourol Urodyn 13(5):507–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cosson M, Lambaudie E, Boukerrou M, Lobry P, Crepin G, Ego A (2004) A biomechanical study of the strength of vaginal tissues. Results on 16 post-menopausal patients presenting with genital prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112(2):201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takano CC, Girao MJ, Sartori MG, Castro RA, Arruda RM, Simoes MJ et al (2002) Analysis of collagen in parametrium and vaginal apex of women with and without uterine prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 13(6):342–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reay Jones NH, Healy JC, King LJ, Saini S, Shousha S, Allen-Mersh TG (2003) Pelvic connective tissue resilience decreases with vaginal delivery, menopause and uterine prolapse. Br J Surg 90(4):466–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Etlik O, Arslan H, Odabasi O, Odabasi H, Harman M, Celebi H et al (2005) The role of the MR-fluoroscopy in the diagnosis and staging of the pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Radiol 53:136–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 7(8):1309–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(1):71–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozasa H, Mori T, Togashi K (1992) Study of uterine prolapse by magnetic resonance imaging: Topographical changes involving the levator ani muscle and the vagina. Gynecol Obstet Invest 34:43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL (1981) Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol 57:357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fielding JR, Griffiths DJ, Versi E, Mulkern RV, Lee MLT, Jolesz FA (1998) MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. Am J Roentgenol 171:1607–1610Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bertsschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, Treiber K, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Urogynecology Journal 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne Hsu
    • 1
  • Luyun Chen
    • 2
  • Aimee Summers
    • 1
  • James A. Ashton-Miller
    • 2
  • James O. L. DeLancey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyL4000 Women’s HospitalAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringL4000 Women’s HospitalAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations