International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 12, pp 1399–1404 | Cite as

Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice

  • Steven M. Minaglia
  • Begüm Özel
  • Nicole M. Gatto
  • Lisa Korst
  • Daniel R. MishellJr
  • David A. Miller
Original Article

Abstract

A study was conducted to describe the rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration in a large cohort of women and to identify the characteristics associated with this complication. Data from all vaginal deliveries occurring between January 1996 and December 2004 at one institution were used to compare women with and without anal sphincter lacerations. Among 16,667 vaginal deliveries, 1,703 (10.2%) anal sphincter lacerations occurred. Regression models suggested that episiotomy (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.16, 1.58), vacuum delivery (OR 3.19; 95% CI 2.69, 3.79), and forceps delivery (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.94, 4.02) were each associated with the increased risk of anal sphincter laceration. Year of delivery was associated with a decreased risk of anal sphincter laceration (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.92, 0.96) with the rate of laceration decreasing from 11.2% to 7.9% during the study period. Episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery are significant, modifiable risk factors. Changes in obstetric practice may have contributed to the dramatic reduction in anal sphincter laceration during the study period.

Keywords

Perineal laceration Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration Operative vaginal delivery Episiotomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartran CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MR (1997) Fecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:46–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308:887–891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mellerup Sorensen S, Bondensen H, Istre O, Vilmann P (1998) Perineal rupture following vaginal delivery. Long-term consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:315–318Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J (1996) Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:1034–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers RL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1998) Third-degree obstetric perineal tear: long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair. Br J Surg 85:1433–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haadem K, Dahlstrom JA, Ling L, Ohrlander S (1987) Anal sphincter function after delivery rupture. Obstet Gynecol 70:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haadem K, Ohrlander S, Lingman G (1988) Long-term ailments due to anal sphincter rupture caused by delivery—a hidden problem. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 27:27–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM (2001) Obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 98:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Legino LJ, Woods MP, Rayburn WF, McGoogan LS (1988) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. 50 year’s experience at a university hospital. J Reprod Med 33:423–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clemons JL, Towers GD, McClure GB, O’Boyle AL (2005) Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1620–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dandolu V, Chatwani A, Harmanli O, Floro C, Gaughan JP, Hernandez E (2005) Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:304–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green JR, Soohoo SL (1989) Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 73:732–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Dekker GA, Deville W, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG (1997) Third-degree obstetric perineal tears: risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:563–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’Sullivan MJ (2000) Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1083–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bansal RK, Tan WM, Ecker JL, Bishop JT, Kilpatrick SJ (1996) Is there a benefit to episiotomy at spontaneous vaginal delivery? A natural experiment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:897–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rizk DE, Abadir MN, Thomas LB, Abu-Zidan F (2005) Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:395–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P (2000) Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 95:464–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber AM, Meyn L (2002) Episiotomy use in the United States, 1979–1997. Obstet Gynecol 100:1177–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML (2005) Births: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep 5:1–116Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O’Connell R, O’Herlihy C (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92:955–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams A, Tincello DG, White S, Adams EJ, Alfirevic Z, Richmond DH (2005) Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury. BJOG 112:1066–1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U, Huber S, Strobl B, Hantschmann P et al (2002) The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:214–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, McElrath TF, Lieberman ES (1999) Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 94:259–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Urogynecology Journal 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Minaglia
    • 1
    • 3
  • Begüm Özel
    • 1
  • Nicole M. Gatto
    • 2
  • Lisa Korst
    • 1
  • Daniel R. MishellJr
    • 1
  • David A. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park Medical CenterBaldwin ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations