Has the true prevalence of voiding difficulty in urogynecology patients been underestimated?
- 116 Downloads
Voiding difficulty has been relatively overlooked as a diagnosis. Previous estimates of its prevalence have generally been no more than 14% with one exception at 24%. The aim of this study is to determine the true prevalence and associations of voiding difficulty using a validated definition [urine flow rate under 10th centile of the Liverpool Nomograms and/or residual urine volume (by transvaginal ultrasound) more than 30 ml]. This study involved 592 women referred for an initial urogynecological assessment including urodynamics. Data were separated according to the presence or absence of voiding difficulty. The prevalence of voiding difficulty was 39%, far higher than previous estimates. It is the third most common urodynamic diagnosis behind urodynamic stress incontinence (USI—72%) and uterine/vaginal prolapse (61%) and ahead of the overactive bladder (13%). Voiding difficulty significantly increased in prevalence with age and increasing grades of all types of uterine/vaginal prolapse. Prolapse appeared to be the main factor in the age deterioration. Other significant positive relationships with voiding difficulty were prior hysterectomy and prior continence surgery, whilst USI and the symptom and sign of stress incontinence had significant inverse relationships.
KeywordsUrinary incontinence Urodynamics Voiding difficulty Uterine/vaginal prolapse
- 1.Sutherst JR, Frazer MI, Richmond DH, Haylen BT (1990) Introduction to clinical gynaecological urology. Butterworths, London, p 121Google Scholar
- 9.Versi E, Harvey MA, Hudson LB (1999) The symptom of voiding dysfunction: its predictive value in the diagnosis of emptying function disorder. Urogynaecologia 2:71Google Scholar
- 12.Haylen BT, Parys BT, Verity L, Schulz S, Zhou J, Law MG, Sutherst JR (2005) Can we identify the women more likely to experience recurrent UTI. Int Urogynecol J 16(Suppl 2):S45Google Scholar
- 13.Yang A, Mostwin J, Genadry R, Sanders R (1993) Patterns of prolapse demonstrated with dynamic fastscan MRI: reassessment of conventional concepts of pelvic floor weaknesses. Neurourol Urodyn 12:310Google Scholar
- 17.Fantl JA, Smith PJ, Schneider V et al (1982) Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:1017–1024Google Scholar
- 21.Parys BT, Haylen BT, Woolfenden KA, Parsons KF (1989) Vesico-urethral dysfunction after simply hysterectomy. Neurourol Urodyn 8:315–316Google Scholar
- 23.Groutz A, Gordon D, Avni A, Lessing JB, David MP (1998) Subjective symptoms of voiding difficulties—are they substantiated by objective urodynamics data? Neurourol Urodyn 17(4):430–431Google Scholar
- 24.Salvatore S, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Digesu AG, Soligo M, Lalia M, Milani R (2000) Urodynamic studies in obstructed women. Neurourol Urodyn 19(4):480–481Google Scholar