Urogynecology experience in Canada’s obstetrics and gynecology residency programs
- 60 Downloads
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the exposure of obstetrics and gynecology residents to urogynecologic training and to compare this to the program directors’ expectations. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was performed surveying the 60 final-year residents and their program directors at all 16 Canadian residency programs. Questions covered areas of knowledge and skills in basic and advanced urogynecology. Thirty-two (53%) residents and nine (56%) program directors responded. Twenty-six (81%) residents had a formal urogynecology rotation with training in incontinence, prolapse, pessary-fitting, and urodynamics. Residents performed a median of: 50 vaginal hysterectomies, 30 anterior repairs, 30 posterior repairs, 35 retropubic urethropexies, and 15 cystoscopies. All other procedures had a median of 6 or less. Responses of residents and program directors correlated well. Although residents in Canada have adequate exposure to simple urogynecologic procedures, they perform few complex cases. Such procedures should be performed by physicians with additional urogynecology fellowship training.
Keywords
Education Incontinence Prolapse Reconstructive pelvic surgery UrogynecologyReferences
- 1.Mandel LP, Lentz GM, Goff BA (2000) Teaching and evaluating surgical skills. Obstet Gynecol 95:783–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Goff BA, Lentz GM, Lee DM, Mandel LS (1999) Formal teaching of surgical skills in an obstetric-gynecologic residency. Obstet Gynecol 93:785–790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Reznick RK (1993) Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg 165:358–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Shueneman AL, Pickelman J, Hesslein R, Freeark RJ (1984) Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents. Surgery 96:288–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Goff BA, Lentz GM, Lee D, Houmard B, Mandel LS (2000) Development of an objective structured assessment of technical skills for obstetric and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol 96:146–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.ACOG Committee Opinion (1994) Credentialing guidelines for new operative procedures No. 142Google Scholar
- 7.Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Working Party (1994) Report of the RCOG working party on training in gynecological endoscopic surgery. London, RCOG PressGoogle Scholar
- 8.ACOG Educational Bulletin (1997) Operative laparoscopy No. 239Google Scholar
- 9.American College of Surgeons (1995) Statements on emerging surgical technologies and the evaluation of credentials. Surg Endosc 9:207–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.The Sub-committee on Urogynecology of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (1995). Educational objectives for residents in obstetrics and gynecology for training in urogynecology and pelvic floor dysfunction. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can 17:163–169Google Scholar
- 11.American Urogynecology Society Education Committee (2003) Resident educational objectives, 5th ednGoogle Scholar
- 12.American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Committee of Urogynecology / Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (1996) Guide to learning in urogynecology/reconstructive pelvic surgeryGoogle Scholar
- 13.IUGA Guidelines for Training in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) (2002) IUGA educational committee. Int Urogynecol J 13:386–395Google Scholar
- 14.Flood CG, Drutz HP, Dela Cruz A, Brown D (1997) Urogynaecology training in obstetrics and gynaecology programmes across Canada. J SOGC 19:51–57Google Scholar
- 15.Scotti RJ, Davidson EC (1994) Formal resident training in urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. A six-year survey. J Reprod Med 39:631–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Coates KW, Kuehl TJ, Bachofen CG, Shull BL (2001) Analysis of surgical complications and patient outcomes in a residency training program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1380–1383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar